Main Page
Pictures
Who's Who
Filmography
Reviews
Interview's
About Me
Star Trek Stuff
| |
HOODWINK
The New South Wales Film Corporation present[s] a CB Films Production. HOODWINK.1
©1980 CB Films Pty Ltd. Budget: $1 million. Location: Sydney. Made with
the financial assistance of Faywin Investments Pty Ltd and The New South Wales Film
Corporation. Australian distributor: Hoyts. Video: Australian Video. Rating:
M (June 1981; 2432.88m). 35mm. 89 minS.2
Producers: Pom Oliver, Errol Sullivan.
Scriptwriter. Ken Quinnell. Story inspired by Carl Synnerdahl.
Director of photography: Dean Semler.
Production designer: Ross Major.
Wardrobe: Robyn Schuurmans.
Editor: Nicholas Beauman.
Composer: Cameron Allan.
Sound recordist: Gary Wilkins.
Sound editors: Andrew Steuart; Penn Robinson (fx); Lindsay Frazer (dia.).
Mixer: Peter Fenton.
Cast
John Hargreaves (Martin), Judy Davis (Sarah), Dennis Miller (Ralph), Wendy Hughes (Lucy),
Max Cullen (Buster), Paul Chubb (Reid), Michael Caton (Shapley), Wendy Strehlow (Martin's
Sister), Kim Deacon (Marian), Les Foxcroft (Baldy), Colin Friels (Robert), Ralph Cotterill
(Shakey), Brian McDermott (Collins), Paul Sonkilla 3 (Lancaster), Geoffrey Rush (Detective 1), Tony Strachan (Chicka), Willie
Fennell (Bank Manager), Ray Meagher (Shaw), Neil Redfern (Jimmy), Martin Vaughan
(Solicitor).
Hoodwink fits into the romantic-crime genre, focusing on an individual antihero. Most of
his behaviour is interpreted in psychological terms, and most strikingly (but not
surprisingly) there is little attempt to situate his story in a social context (i.e., sex,
class etc.). This could be explained as giving the audience what they want, but it is
really nothing less than distorting the social and political practice of cinema in the
name of 'entertainment'. ' Hoodwink might have been more than just another 'entertaining'
film with 'popular' appeal if its film-makers had tried to tell the story from a different
perspective, or had employed a nonconventional narrative form which might have opened it
up for more levels of interpretation.
John Hargreaves plays Martin, a con(victed) man who bluffs a number of people into
thinking that he is blind to gain a reduced prison sentence. It is a role that would be a
challenge to any actor, and Hargreaves succeeds well, giving Martin a rough-diamond
physicality and a 'likeable larrikin' presence.
This very characterisation is arguably a reflection of a cultural stereotype linked with
Australia's convict past and she'll-be-right present, and one which many film-makers have
gone to great lengths to construct as being part of the national male identity. Whether it
is or not is extremely contentious.
The characters of Lucy (Wendy Hughes), Marian (Kim Deacon) and Sarah (Judy Davis) are all
reflective of cultural stereotypes of another kind. They are 'threewomen who help create
the problems' for Martin. Lucy deserts him for the 'security' of life as a croupier and a
flat of her own. Marian, a voluptuous dancer and 'pick up' betrays him. And Sarah, wife of
a lay preacher - 'quiet, religious, sexually repressed' - falls in love with him. Love
creates the 'biggest difficulty of all'.
Hughes' and Deacon's performances, though suitably executed, are limited by the
constraints of a narrative that constructs their characters like cut-out paper dolls - as
women are often (mis) represented in film. As for Judy Davis, she proves her ability to
develop a character with a quirk, but the role is really too small for her talents and
magnitude; she virtually disrupts the film. It is also particularly distressing that the
narrative resolves Sarah's conflict and struggle in a very conservative manner.
British director Claude Whattham injects a vaguely British tone in the film's style, mood
and pace. As a visitor to this country, he is able to take a fresh look at the Australian
landscape and have it photographed to convey symbolic meaning. This is especially
noticeable in a scene in Sarah's house where a picture window neatly frames the splendour
of Australia's roaming outback in all its glory.
However, Whatham doesn't seem to make any significant commentary in relation to the
cultural specificity of the story. This might be understandable, considering that he did
not originate the project, but it has resulted in a film that is great to look at but has
little substance.
DAVE SARGENT 4
(1) The double 'O' in the title is, in fact,
interlocking handcuffs.
(2) Stratton quotes the length at 93 mins, while the video slick states
99 mins.
(3) Usually spelt 'Sonkkjla'.
(4) Extracted from Sargent's review iii Citicitii Papers (see
References).
References
'Judy Davis', a career interview with the actor by John Ley and Steve Bisley, Cinema
Papers, no. 32, May-June 1981, pp, 116-21.
'Hoodwink', a review by Dave Sargent, Cinema Papers, no 34, September-October 1981, pp.
397-8
'Wendy Hughes' , an interview with the actor by Richard Brennan, Cinema Papers, no. 40,
October 1982, pp. 428-32.
'Captain of the Clouds', an article (with quotes) on actor John Hargreaves by Gail McCrea,
Cinema Papers, no. 56, March 1986, pp. 38-9, 40.
<Return to Reviews Page>
|