Frontalism
Every example of Egyptian art from any time period strictly adheres to
the same style. There is a code, or a set of rules for producing the artwork.
The style is called frontalism. In reliefs or paintings, frontailsm means that
the head of the character is always drawn in profile, while the body is seen
from the front. Although the face is to the side, the eye is drawn in full.
The legs are turned to the same side as the head, with one foot placed in
front of the other. The head is at right angles to the body. Every figure,
in paintings or sculptures, stands or sits with a formal, stiff, and rigid
posture. The stance of the body is severe, but the faces are calm and serene,
and almost always tilted slightly towards the sky, as if the figures were
basking in the warm sun.
It is truly remarkable that in thousands of years, this was the one and only
style. There are slightly different "rules" for the drawing of animals and slaves
from the way pharoahs and gods and portrayed. These are manifest in the examples
that follow on these pages. (oooh!)
|
| (far left) This early wooden
sculpture is entitled "Sheik" It exemplifies the style of "frontalism,"
which never leaves the evolution of Egyptian sculpture over thousands of years.
(right)"Menkue and his Queen" are cut from stone, but do not
stand freely; they are not completely liberated from the rock. This sculpture
is dated later than Sheik. Rulers are now shown with their wives.
While their bodies are stiff, their faces are serene and natural when compared
to the Sheik. The style in which they are sculpted was dictated by the pharoah
himself. The austere posture was also a symbol, a way to show authority.
When looking at Menkue, the way he is sculpted, makes you think that
he was a very important person.
|
"Ti Hunting the Hippopotamus" is carved on a surface of a stone.
This form of artwork is called a relief. Here we see frontalism in the two
dimensional form. Ti's shoulders and head make right angles. All the figures,
humans and hippos alike, are etched in profile. However, the slaves and the
animals are more natural and relaxed. Ti is enormous, while the slaves who
row his boat are comparatively small. Also, in real life, hippos are larger than
people, but this image of Ti could easily outweigh two of the hippos he is hunting.
Why did the Egyptians paint this way? Didn't they know better? Didn't they have
the artistic skill to paint things as they really were? The theory behind the
style is that Ti is a pharoah, therefore associated with the gods, and to show
that he is a diety, he is painted in the severe style of frontalism. The slaves
are lesser beings. To show this, they are painted more naturally, and the animals
are painted even more realistically than that.
Cute little guy, isn't he? Another artistic "rule" is that nothing should be drawn
infront of the face or body of the pharoah. That is why, in this painting, the king has
drawn his bow behind his back, with his arms bent at unusual angles. This was not a hunting technique!
This noble is spending his leisure time hunting fowl with his cat. His wife
accompanies him, as many women did. Notice that the birds, and especially the fish,
are painted very realistically, with attention paid to the slightest details, while the
humans conform to the cartoon-like frontalistic style.
|
|
"Akenaten and Nefretiti"
During the reign of Akenaten, there were many political and religious changes.
Akenaten decided that Egyptians should workship one god, Aten, and he relocated
the pharoah's house from the capitol of Thebes to Armana, the city of the cult of the
Aten, the sun god. Akenaten even changed his name, which was origianally Akenahmun,
which means servant of the head-god Ahmun, to Akenaten, which means servant of
the sun. These changes influenced the art and sculpture. The rigid poses
of former images were completely abandoned. Akenaten ordered his artists to
portray him in relaxed, natural poses. The characters in these portraits seem
to move with fluidity in comparison to the old reliefs, where figures seem to
be stuck in their formal positions for eternity.
Here, the sun god, represented by the disk, extends his arm-like rays
down to Akenaten and Nefretiti. Akenaten's physical traits
showed through in the artwork, whereas beforehand, the representations were only
slightly suggestive of the subject's personal features. In the picture at the
far right, Akenaten is show with a potruding chin, oblong head, thick lips,
and his belly hangs over his garment. Any other pharoah would never expose
his foibles in stone. Perhaps Akenaten wanted to personalize his image, so that
he would be remembered by his face as the pharoah who brought renching change
to Egyptian society. This change in the style of art, which was called the
Armana style, dominated while he and then his son, the famous King Tut, held
the throne. The unique artwork sets Akenaten's reign apart from all the other
pharoahs. Perhaps this was his modus operendi.
Akenaten caused so much outrage among his people, that King Tut, upon
inheriting the throne, immeadiatly changed the religion back to polytheoism,
and changed the ending of his name, which was "aten," like his predecessor,
to "ahmun" so that his permanent name, and the name on his tomb, reads
"Tutenkahmun." The cult of Aten, however, was the major relgious infuence in
young life, and therefore there is much evidence of the sun god in the art
found in his tomb.
| After Tutenkahmun's death, the Armana style immeadiately ended, and the
original, formal poses of the past were revived. These are two of Tutenkahmun's sucessors.
|
|
| The artwork that accompanies Ramses the second's reign was extreme. This
scultpure of Ramses is also a structutral component of his temple. Indeed, he
looks more like a pillar than a person. His queen is very hard to see. She is
a tiny figurine adjacent to his calf. This style of art is Ramses's symbol of
authority.
|
| |