Worm Hole Review logo

for

THE BEAST OF YUCCA FLATS




   All the time people lament, "They don't make 'em like they used to," but they seem to forget that crap has always been abundant, even in the good old days. It's just that the quality items have the best chance of surviving the vicissitudes of time while the crap tends to deteriorate or never see the light of day again. Given enough time, the quality items end up representing about 100% of the remains from a past era. With old movies, the masterpieces are disportionately represented while the bombs are generally kept out of sight. That is, until Mystery Science Theatre 3000 came to be and started uncovering obscure, low-grade movies left and right, with "The Beast of Yucca Flats"--made back in 1961--ranking among the worst.

How bad is this movie? Terrible, absolutely terrible, so terrible that it gets my dreaded--but seldom given--rating of zero dots. Many bad movies have at least one good point, usually that good point is they make you laugh at them. However, "The Beast of Yucca Flats" manages to be bad but in a most boring way. Even though the movie is 54 minutes long, it feels twice that length. Other than people having the darndest time shooting a target as large as Tor Johnson (who plays the mutated beast), there is hardly any action. Even worse, there is hardly any dialogue either. Sure, there's a narrator trying to be profound by making statements like "Always on the prowl. Looking for something, or somebody to kill. Quench the killer’s thirst," "A man runs, somebody shoots at him," and "Boys from the City. Not yet caught by the Whirlwind of Progress. Feed soda pop to the thirsty pigs." However, while delivering these "gems of truth", the narrator sounds about as emotional as the synthetic voice from a Speak 'N Spell toy, and he speaks all this in a sluggish meter, somewhat like a schizophrenic who has drinken about a pint of Dimetapp. Perhaps the scariest thing about this movie is what might have gone through the head of writer/director/producer Coleman Francis, who, not too surprisingly, plays the nutty narrator as well. What was this mad dog thinking? And if he wasn't doing the thinking, were there demonic voices in his head commanding him to make a movie abhorrent to all living things?




QUARTER BY QUARTER ANALYSIS OF MOVIE

OVERALL RATING

0 out of 12

** NOTE: The more dots on the domino, the better the movie. 12 dots on the domino is the best rating while no dots means the tape has a date with the eraser. **

Click here to see the list of other movie reviews.
Or go to the Worm-Hole home page to see some other amusing stuff!

The Worm-Hole Reviews are written by Matt Barnes.

1