Sign Guestbook View Guestbook

Hello friends!
My name is Detlef Stiebeling, and I live in Montreal, Canada. Although I am a trained art historian (Ph.D. 1986, McGill - click HERE if you are in need of an art historian and would like to see my CV), the great passion of virtually all my life has been watches, and it pre-dates my interest in art by many years. I got my first "good" watch when I was 15 years old, an electronic Tissot PR 516 GL, which at the time - pre-quartz - was one of the most accurate models on the market. It had a transistor chip which regulated the movement of the balance, and the only thing more accurate then (1969) were models marketed by Bulova, which used a tuning fork instead of a balance, but they were too expensive for me.
As it was, I had to take a job in construction, at my age illegally working 10 hours a day for the whole summer vacation (six weeks then in Germany). Because of this job (shifts started at 7:30 AM), I almost missed watching the first moon landing, which was broadcast very early on TV. The following year, I read about what was to become the most radical revolution in the history of the wristwatch, the first quartz watch. Late in 1972, HMW, (previously Hamilton Watch Company) of Lancaster, Pennsylvania, began to sell the Pulsar, the first all-electronic wristwatch.
The Pulsar's most striking feature was its time display. Gone were the traditional hands and dial. Instead, it indicated the time of day in flashing red digits at the push of a button. Advertised as a "Time Computer" and initially sold in fine jewelry stores for $2100 (roughly the same price as a Chevrolet Vega in those years), the costly Pulsar was one of the earliest consumer products of the microelectronics revolution. Needless to say, it became the new object of my dreams, until Texas Instruments marketed the first affordable quartz watches.
The dream turned into a nightmare when the Japanese got involved and nearly wrecked the Swiss watch industry, which had to face the choice of adapting or perishing. Pretty soon, all you could get was quartz, until a wind of conservatism arose in the mid-80s. People began to realize that quartz watches, while highly accurately keeping time, were essentially dead things. Mechanical watches, with their little hearts beating in rhythm with our own, saw a revival and the industry began to recover. During the crisis years, every company that wanted to survive produced quartz models. I remember very well following the progress with my friends, debating whether Rolex would do it (they did), whether Patek Philippe would give in (they did). The well known, rather presumptuous slogan used by Blancpain, "SINCE 1735, THERE HAS NEVER BEEN A QUARTZ BLANCPAIN WATCH. AND THERE NEVER WILL BE" is misleading, because when the quartz revolution began in the 1970's, Blancpain made no watches at all. Like its great German counterpart, A. Lange & Söhne, Blancpain had folded and only existed as a name on paper until being resurrected with the advent of the mechanical revolution.
Quartz watches are probably here to stay, although their accuracy has already been eclipsed by radio-controlled clocks (naturally, I have one) and their wearable wristwatch counterparts. These are actually not watches at all, although they have a quartz backup, but radio receivers that are tuned in to an atomic clock (I believe mine is in Colorado), from which they receive a signal with the exact time several times a day. There is no need for adjustments for daylight savings time, and it is sort of fun to check whether the time signal on the radio is correct. As you may know, atomic clocks are at present the most precise way of measuring time, accurate to within a second in a million years, and actually more sound than the Earth's rotation. Although in Europe, radio controlled watches have been marketed for years - Junghans has been a pioneer in the field - they seem slow to catch on in North America. Still, I believe that in some way and for some purpose, mechanical watches will continue to be produced. Despite its flawed precision when compared to quartz, the mechanical watch stands as a masterpiece of human ingenuity and craftsmanship. All that has been said and written about our greatest works of art, by masters from Phidias to Michelangelo and Rodin, can be applied with equal validity to the great timepieces that have been created in the past few centuries.
On the pages to follow (I'm not sure how far I'll be able to expand this), I would like to share my love for and interest in watches with you and look at some of my favorite things, beginning with some that I either own or would like to own. If you have any comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Here is my most recent acquisition, the Omega Speedmaster Professional, nicknamed "the Moonwatch," because it is the only watch to have visited the moon. I'm not sure how many times and in how many cities I have stared at this almost legendary timepiece since, as a teenager, I watched the Apollo 11 astronauts on our little b&w TV, merrily hopping around on the moon. I finally decided to buy one, and wear it almost every day now, switching between the metal and leather bands. True enough, it's big, not very glamorous, I have to wind it every day, and the chrono function comes in handy only on the odd occasion when I time the boiling of eggs, but I love this watch and all the memories that come with it!
Click on the Omega symbol to go to their web site, on the picture below it to go to one of the most affectionate reviews of the watch I have come across or on the watch to go to the "Speedmaster Professional Owners Group!"
This is my OMEGA Seamaster, ancestor to the infamous "James Bond" watch. I purchased it a few years ago through the now-famous eBay, which was still relatively little-known then. Two weeks after I got the watch, it promptly stopped working. I had it serviced, and apparently that was the first time in its life it had been cleaned and lubricated. Since then, it has been running quite well. I actually prefer the styling to the present Seamaster, which looks too pretentious to me. This one is very small and light.
Click on the name or the picture to visit Omega!
Perhaps because it marks the beginning of my fascination with watches, I have always maintained a nostalgic interest in Tissot. Founded in 1853 in Le Locle, Tissot is today one of the members of the Swatch Group. Throughout the years, the company has received worldwide acclaim thanks to some popular innovations, some of them rather quirky.
These include the first anti-magnetic watch, the first plastic watch (Idea 2001), the first watch made of stone (The Rockwatch), and even the first watch made of wood (The Woodwatch).

Today, it seems as though there is little interest in the Swatch Group to give a definite direction and recognizable image to Tissot, because the company's products are quite diffused. The point is made by two recent products, the ultra-conservative Lisboa on the left and the latest incarnation of my multi-purpose instrument, the Two-Timer on the right.

Two watches I am lusting for right now are the IWC Mark XII on the left and its "big brother," the Fliegerchrono, here the ceramic version, an automatic with day and date display. Interestingly enough, IWC does not make the base movement for either of them: the Flieger uses the ubiquitous Valjoux 7750 by ETA (but much improved!), the Mark XII has the Jaeger 889/2 as base.
However, both movements are strictly selected and modified in the typical IWC tradition. Actually, if anything, I prefer the Mark XII like this, because I have been a fan of both IWC and Jaeger-LeCoultre for a long time, and it combines the best of both companies. Some may find the Mark XII plain looking, but to me it has the same appeal of a well-crafted piece of equipment that I see in a Porsche 911, for example.

Click on the left picture to go to IWC, the right one to go to the TimeZone IWC discussion forum!

My candidate for the title "watch of the last decade of the second millenium," is the Lange 1 by the German company A. Lange&Söhne (right). I first saw a picture of it in 1994 when I was living in France, and was quite simply blown away by it from the very beginning. If anything, my appreciation of it has since grown. The Lange 1 is unique in that it combines on its dial two sub-dials for minutes, hours, and seconds, a hand for the power reserve, and that beautiful over-sized date display, and none of these overlaps with the other. To my knowledge, there is no other wristwatch with that design. Much more could be said about this marvel: click on the right picture to go to the TIMEZONE-Lange forum, the left one to go to Peter Chong's Lange web site.
On the other hand, if I ever were lucky enough to be given the choice, I might well opt for the Sax-0-mat with over-sized date (two versions, with and without date in the picture on the left). It has a unique zero reset function, which goes beyond the more common hack feature that originated in military timepieces. In the Lange, the second hand actually resets to "12" or "0" when the crown is pulled out, making the setting of the precise time very easy indeed. Both Lange 1 and Sax-0-mat have a sapphire crystal case back, which makes it possible to admire the beautiful movement any time one so desires.

Page 1:
hello
Page 2:
nice things
Page 3:
Audemars Piguet
Page 4:
IWC, JLC
Page 5:
Patek Philippe
Page 6:
Flieger
Page 7:
more Flieger
Page 8:
Zenith, Eberhard
Page 9:
chronographs
Page 10:
big money!
Page 11:
mo' money
Page 12:
more chronos
Page 13:
less known gems
Page 14:
moonstruck
Page 15:
pictures & links
1