Thanks to Terrence Ho of MIT. The entire collection of the MTS series
is now available at URL:
After 9 months in S'pore, it's time for me to consider the possibility of staying here for the long term, however remote it might be. I guess this means that I finally have to fill out the application form for permanent resident, or resident alien as in the official US vocabulary. I think I have been delaying it long enough. I think it's also time for me to make some critical comments regarding differences between the two countries.
There is one very fundamental philosophical difference between US and S'pore (putting the word philosophical usually means you can get away with it.) You can label it as Confucianism versus Western value, society versus individual, or whatever buzzwords you wish to use. It boils down to this: In S'pore the needs of many supposedly outweight the needs of the few. While in the States, the needs of the few supposedly outweights the needs of many. It's funny that the situation in the States sounds contradictory to the belief of democracy. Case in point, in the States people might go a great length to protect an individual's right (no illegal seizure of evidence, innocent before proven guilty, right to bear arm, freedom of speech and press, etc.) while some criminals can get away scott free. But in S'pore, a few innocent people might suffer (no one free phone call to the attorney, guilty before proven innocent, internal security act where the government can hold a person indefinitely, restriction of speech and press, etc.) while most criminals will be caught and punished.
But benefits of either philosophies are still not as clear cut as they might appear. For example, the well-received portable toilets in New York were never implemented because some physically challenged organization claimed that they were discriminated against. Then there is this NRA who are trying to stop the legislation on assault rifle ban when most of the public support the ban. In S'pore, you sacrifice a little of freedom for the good of the society, at least in concept. I like to use the quote "freedom is chaos in a better lighting." In a few years, most individuals here will not be able to afford a brand new car. But this restriction will help to cut down on the pollution and congestion thus benefit the public in general.
The effect of all these is that in the States, we strive for individualism while in S'pore they strive for conformity. We tend to have more creative and expressive people in the States. But in S'pore, instead of letting the individualism flourish, they tend to create better workers and soldiers. But recently there are a few dangerous precedents that the government is increasingly putting the blame of local problems on the supposedly "Western" value. My answer is that the local censorship board is not doing good enough of a job to filter out these Western values 8-) But seriously, people usually put blames on others when they couldn't figure out how to solve the problems. The government may begin to realized that they can not stop this thing called individualism.
But there might be some hope for a compromise. The recent legislation on anti-smoking laws in the States have put a damper into personal freedom. And S'pore has been trying to encourage students to speak up. Who's to say who is wrong and who is right? Is one better than the other? Well, the answer will be revealed in MTS part 300 8-)
13/10/94