Genesis Site Main Menu Is Babel Real ? |
Stonehenge, Salisbury Plain, England. |
CONCERNING STONEHENGE ! FONT> | ||
REALITY OF BABEL ? Note. This section refers back to the calculations in the main mathematical sections. It will be necessary to understand the astronomical calculations before the truth of this present section can be fully appreciated. The graphs in those sections are directly proportional to the ground plan of Stonehenge. In mathematical terms the two are identical, both are models of the Solar System drawn to the same exponential functions. The only difference is in format, Stonehenge is circular whilst my graphs are Cartesian. Stonehenge uses Perihelion and Aphelion of orbits, my graphs use mean. |
The mathematical analysis demonstrates that the solar system orbits fall into two sections.
The following mathematical demonstration of the primitive use of the exponents illustrates the inadequacy of 20th century archaeological theory.
Orbital data in astronomical units abstracted from Norton's Star Atlas (17th edition).
A) Graphs in mathematical sections are compressed on horizontal, outer, axis for practical and aesthetic reasons. This compression is purely visual and does not affect the mathematics. In this current section it is necessary to represent both axes on a one-to-one scale.
B) Mathematical sections refer to mean orbits of planets in AU. In this current section the perihelion and aphelion distances are used, not the mean.
Stonehenge Monument Ground-plan is Required. (Stonehenge, Neolithic monument, Salisbury Plain, UK)
A) Ideally an original archaeological drawing of ground-plan should be used. Drawing here shown is a one-to-one scale reconstruction.
B) Edges of features of monument ground plan conform to proportionality of Solar System orbits, perihelion and aphelion, raised to appropriate exponent.
C) Stonehenge is circular format graph, in all essentials it is identical and equivalent to Solar System Cartesian format graph.
D) Drawing one represents one-to-one expanded graph fig 4 (See math, first section) superimposed on drawing of monument.
E) Drawing two is original fig 4 with Stonehenge conforming features shown in red, missing features in black.
F) It is clear the monument is graphical representation of the perihelion and aphelion distances of the orbits of the system, incorporating orbits raised to the exponents. It is in all respects a small mathematical model of the Solar System, and demonstrates that the main essentials of the mathematical analysis was known to the builders.
G) Monument accuracy is better than +/- 1%
H) Monument is dated to circa 3000 BC.
|
Graphs are math section fig 4, graphs of ... | ||
[(
p(9/4p).Ln30) -
F](2p/3) =
20p |
An Observation It is noted that the top elevation, the top or plan view, of the monument connects with the heavens in a mathematical sense. This is reminiscent of the Biblical description of the Tower of Babel. The structure known as the 'Tower' of Babel is similarly described. "A tower whose top may reach unto the heavens". (Genesis Chp 11 verse 4) A more accurate translation reads :- " Let us build a place of pillars whose top (view) may connect with the heavens."
Examination of scripture reveals that, contrary to popular myth, Babel was not destroyed. If it was ever real, it could still exist. It was supposedly built by survivors of a disaster. If we accept the terms of the story we must also accept that the builders would be reduced to primitive circumstances. They would have only primitive tools and methods to build their repository of scientific knowledge. Comprehensive study of maths is required. Hypothesis If the ancients knew of the Creation Equation then they might be expected to try to record it for posterity. This they did in the structure once known as the tower of Babel, but more recently referred to as 'Stonehenge'. Ancient peoples who knew about the Creation Equation would also record their knowledge in writing, hence Genesis Chp 1 v 1.
|
Summary of similarities between Babel and Stonehenge. | ||
1] Both very old. 2] Both constructed with primitive tools. 3] Both constructed with primitive methods. 4] Both grand monuments. 5] Both located to West of Ararat. 6] Both built on a plain. 7] Both built to last. 8] Both were unfinished. 9] Both consist of pillars. (Babel probably) 10] Both are unique. 11] Both have no precedent. 12] Both relate to 'Isles of Gentiles' 13] Both connect to the heavens. 14] Both of unknown purpose, mistakenly assumed to be pagan temples.
|
Top of this page | Math Menu |
Return to Main Menu |
Summary of Equations |