"Dakar" is here! |
-My name is Boris Dobrovensky |
E-mail! -Call! 972 4 8522270 |
VIEW Sign on GuestBook |
Human Rights Help | address |
To Topics of the Message |
The Israeli High Court for Justice |
< the second theme> 2. -The judge nomination commission. -As it declared by sir M. Shamgar, -the purpose of composition of the parliament commission of judge nomination is prevention of being of conspiracy in judge nomination. -I wish oppose to declaration of court's chief. In general it's no realty prevent patronage by nomination in so little country as Israel. We remember the warning of prof Michael Bar-Zohar about conspiracy in election, as corrupted people wishes help with advertizing provided that he would commit support their interest in Knesset after his election. -The perception that the Israeli court is independent from political administration is very impressive but not exactly. -Let's remind that great part of our parliament members are lawyers with corporate interest, mentality and bias. These circumstances lites to forward the satisfactory laws for interrelated lawyer's community. -The judge's nomination commission consists of jurists. -Really, these circumstances makes possibility for patronage by judge nomination, the interest negation.
Precisely a short time ago in the press were publication of existing a patronizing by judge's nominations. Is known the precedents of corruption in this community. All agree that a judge is a human being only. Not any Angel. Therefrom in my opinion: As there are not proofs for hypothesis of an ideal judge, as there is nobody, have the right to sale for public a legend on judge's authority to decide against of the law. The impression from practice give me the ambition to declare that our parliament granted the judges excessive authority; -also problematic is the trial session by public exclusion, and other exclusive plenty of rope for judges transgression. -Real, the rules as judge is free to edit a wrong session records and the litigants are helpless against judge's remissness, gives stimulation for judicial corruption. -Reality our judge has no responsibility for his decision! -Aside from a danger of tendentious trial, the trial without jury enable for cause whitens for felony(!). -Plenty of felony has turning to white after few years. -For any "interesting persons" it is OKAY condition, but the quest if the public interest is watched?!?
-I mind that the jurisdiction of "judicial activity" may cause the lawyers rampage and tyranny now and in the future. This conception can turn into an antidemocratic Trojan Horse.
I am not against the right of a judge discussing the law; but in opposite to the administration's conception I sure -the trial is not the place for the revision of the law; for this purpose exists the democratic institutes, -they and public have the authority on law critic and revision. I believe the court process must be under public control, as it conventional in USA, in Europeans democracies. The Human Right Watch impossible without obedience to law. The parliament is indebted to enact on judge's responsibility for normal trial management according to the law and for watch the citizen's equality. -Only in this way would be reassure the human rights, the public justice and the Person's Dignity. I believe the judge should initiate his activity in the court by guard on the Law and guard the equality before the law, -otherwise we open the door for danger of corruption and for public anarchy. The law give for every person a right on justice trial. -The trial without juries or witnesses opens a possibility for injustice and for using the court for violence a person and for cause injustice. The trial without juries or witnesses opens a possibility for using the court to whiten the felony. I sure that any interest lawyer has deceive the parliament, so as suggested to access the law giving the excessive authority for judge. -Under a logic understanding -that on public vision every conspiracy would disclose, -but after the close doors everything possible. -The conception of "judicial activity" is problematic; -there is public interest to discuss the concept.
|
-Should not be Court independence from parliament, -It's clear, that each judge is independent, and has immunity always, -up to point he watches the law. -No more of this. As each citizen. |
-The new concept "judicial activity" in Israeli court, has proclaimed by the Israeli Supreme Court chief A. Barak; -under his idea each judge may does judgment on his conscience and understanding of justice. -Author of this message is an engineer as fail -a victim of prey hate of several Israeli judges. -A part of damage cases are given -here. -It's my citizen's responsibility disclose from the eyewash husk the tyranny wrong tendentious. I wish explain to public a philosophical vacuum and absurdity of "judicial activity" perception. -I will disclose the public danger consist in the hypocrisy using here by Human Rights terms. We wish attend a people as the perception "judicial activity" no were proved by anyone scientific method. -In activist phraseology of our court chief no was demonstrate in this theme nothing from scientists, only declared by the chief as each, who resist to his ( of A. Barak) "judicial activity" perception, -he no understand nothing in scientific of the advance(!) democracy !! -The chief adds to his phrase few words from -human rights popular lexicon for neutralize any opponents of his "judicial activity", with these words finished his scientific... -I would remind here that it's reading not only about concept of a nameless engineer, but this phrase were directed against much learned lawyers, as most of they has told against the "judicial activity", as anti- scientist -perception. -It understand that no one of a misters' A. Barak opponents wish no seen as no learned man under wild word's attacks of the court chief. |
( Gazet "Maariv", "The people of the war", page 5, ) -Quote from reminds of general Ury Simchony about given testimony in Agranat Commission: " -I wished to tell (the Agranat Comission) what is happen in the war, in the Nord's Commander. I though that in these purpose I was sending for this commission. But at onse was stopped. -You have only answer the question as will be asking. -It take me much time for realize as the men has no any interest to study all details of happened. They already made their perception and marked the purpose, they wished only to check few points for strengthen their ready conclusion. The question rained one after second: do what said this man and do what said answered other man ?? I no has happy to answer, not was could to remind the proofs under their scheme and their things. ****** End reminder Ury Simchony. ****** Then I com in High court for hearing appeal regarding with sabotage of police does inquiry my complain of intoxication by dentist that used in his treatment Arsenic; becauseŽ sabotage of police department do inquiry and because the medicine offices intrigue resisting make the chemical analyze for disclose theŽ heavy metal intoxication, I liven without need treatment and it caused the health disturbance and my invalidity. The police without any check my complain without consultation with specialist or take a medical documents, -rejected my complain. Mr M. Landoy, as the chief of the court called me in his isolate cabinet. No was opening doors no was a session and no permits me to say my problems and pleas. -He asked me few questions no bond with my text, when I opposed him that he wrote in the proceedings negation of I wished say, -then the ex-chief said me ambitiously: -Please no learn us here to manage a trial. -So the ex-chief edited false protocol for justify his injustice judgment that he did no bond with my appeal. Do it understand? -Then I returned home with nothing. -I liven helpless, the toxic reaction has paralysed my self possibility to act, to think; no left any option to take the needs expert diagnose and then take a special treatment (in case of the heavy metal intoxication must be to clean the body of suffered man with special infusion procedura). -I left without any option to live. -Under their text is all correct. -But it is no were may version. -Aside me in the room were only the court chief, and behind me set a policeman. -What I(as wounded man) can do against these power? -It was abuse no me only, but it was abuse of law abuse of justice, and discredit of the court. -Would you read the remembers of general Ury Simchony, -it's was similar of my witness. -It was "my Agranat Commission" with familiar name: - Moshe Landoy. I remind it as one of real fathers of -"judicial activity" -idea and other. -I enquire the hypothetical question: -How much were the victims more?! |
The description of my page:
The description of my page: |
|
|
Reload this Page |
There is society intolerance ... Why!? | "Dakar" is here! |
- Please - Attorney! - Help me! |
Please Bookmark this page |
To Topics of the Message |