Berkeley
Berkeley was an Idealist who believed that the physical, extended world
does not exist. His catch phrase was "to be is to be perceived."
He claimed that he was only cleaning up how we talk and exposing the way
we currently use 'to be'. Being a Bishop, he strongly believed that
God exists and that God is somewhat of a Cosmic Custodian that keeps
us all on the same page.
"Esse Est Percipi" = "To be is to be perceived"
-
Proof for Esse Est Percipi
-
Argument against Esse Est Percipi
The Extended Material World does not exist.
-
The Extended Material World Does not Exist
-
So what does exist?
-
Berkeley and Language
-
Common Sense
-
Matter
-
Imperialism
-
Sensible "Objects"
-
Two Types of Ideas
God Exists
-
God's Role
-
Proof For God
-
God and Idealism
-
The Problem with Proximate Causes
Proof for Esse Est Percipi
-
P is considered proven if the supposition of its negation is a contradiction.
-
To suppose something about X implies that one perceives X.
-
The Proposition "I suppose that X implies that X is unperceived" is a contradiction.
-
Hence, if I suppose something, then I perceive it.
Argument against the Proof
We wanted to prove that all ideas are perceived.
But... Berkeley proved that at one point in time all ideas are
perceived.
So, his proof doesn't apply to all time, just one particular
moment.
The External World does NOT Exist.
-
To exist is to have being when not perceived.
-
X can exist externally iff X can be conceived to exist without the mind.
-
You can't see a tree (or any other X) that is unseen.
-
So you can't have an external world.
In another words, to exist means that something is perceivable. How
can you perceive "physical matter" which by definition is unperceivable.
Thus, the physical world of matter can't exist.
So what exists?
Ideas, "Spirits", minds, and God exist. That's it.
Other people's ideas exist outside of me.
Extended objects do not exist.
Berkeley and Language
A great deal of Berkeley is playing with Language.
He claims that he is only trying to clarify what we already know and
say.
Example:
You are talking to a gardener.
You ask him if a tree exists across the yard.
He replies, "Yes, it exists."
You ask, "How do you know it exists?"
He replies, "Because I can see it."
This example proves that the common person does not make a distinction
between existence and perception. To common folk, being is being
perceived. What Berkeley is doing is clearing up our muddy language.
He is trying clarify to us the way we currently talk. It is common
sense to believe that being perceived is being.
Common Sense
Extended Material Objects can not produces ideas in me.
Until you show me a thinking shoe, it is absurd to think that shoes
actually exist.
It's common sense!!!
Truth is that which is most common sensical.
Common Sense leads us to Idealism.
Matter
Matter could be.....
1. Cause of Sensations
2. Instrument of God
3. an Occasion
But Berkeley proves that it can't be any of those in The Three Dialogs.
Thus, Matter does not exist. (Read the Three Dialogs for his
proof... or email me a good
explanation)
There will never be any sensory evidence for matter because the definition
of matter is to exist outside of the mind.
Empiricism
Berkeley is an Empiricist. That means that he trusts the senses and
believes reason is fallible. Our fallible reason tricks us into believing
that the extended world actually exists.
Sensible "Object"
We receive sensory input.
A Sensible "Object" is that which "appears" immediately to the senses.
From this Sensible "Object" we infer the external world.
Reason misguides us by tricking us into believing in an external world.
Two Types of Ideas...
The Senses: Vivid and involuntary.
Imagination: Less Vivid and voluntary.
God's Role
Natural Laws work because of God.
God is like a Cosmic Custodian.
God sustains the universe.
Senses are passively received from God.
God gives us most of our ideas, but we can generate some of our own.
We tell others our ideas through language.
We are just like God, only Finite. (That's the curse of Adam!)
Proof for God
I perceive, hence God exists.
God and Idealism
The Mind produces ideas.
Why would God use matter if he didn't have to?
Just ideas works fine.
Problem of Proximate Causes
We have the Idea that matter is a proximate (immediate) Cause of Ideas.
(In other words: "Why is it so abundantly clear that there is matter
in the world?")
-
If that idea is not from God, Berkeley is wrong and there is a material
world.
-
If that idea is from God, then God is tricking us.
So Berkeley has a little problem with Proximate Causes.
[My Philosophy Page] [Joke
Page] [My Interests] [My
Classes] [Free Money?] [Dvorak
Keyboard] [My Pictures]
Visitor Number:
Page Birth Day: 05/29/00
Page Host: Geocities
Last Modified:
Created By: malibu_malv