SI Mechanical (SI_M)

Results of SI_M were for the first time published in the news-group sci.physics under the name "NEW UNIVERSAL LAW OF PHYSICS" from December 22, 1999. (SI is the International System of Units. SI_M is a system built here using only mechanical units.)

Hypothesis:

Protons and electrons are indistinguishable equivalent particles in microcosm, that is to say, they are equivalent in the 4d lattice relatively lattice's links, which are the absolutely elementary particles, link-particles. Three dimensions of microcosm 4d lattice degenerate into our 3d space, and the 4-th dimension of microcosm degenerates into the time axis relatively objects composed of elementary particles, and relatively large conglomerates of particles.

Conclusion:

Mass is space inertia; charge is time inertia. Units for measuring mass and charge must be of the same type. (Imagine the situation then somebody measures the horizontal dimensions in meters, and vertical dimensions in feet. We are now in the analogues situation.) The law “F=ma” must be more general. Acceleration in space, which is measured in L/T² units, must have its analogue in the form of time acceleration, measured in T/L² units.

Let's try to investigate and find the symmetry in the bottom table:

Note:

The conclusion must work in any system of units; and we can take any system. For example, let’s take SI.
Velocity of light is the ratio of 299792458 spatial units to one time unit.
Consequently, in order to calibrate the space-inertia units (mass) and time-inertia units (charge), we must take into account that space unit in SI is 299792458 times smaller than time unit. Hence, between the elementary mass (mass of proton) and elementary charge there must be an equation: q=m_r*k, where k is defined through c³, because of asymmetry of accelerations units (L/T², T/L²) in SI:

[a_r]/[a_t]=c³
(L/T²)/( T/L²) = L³/T³ = c³.

Force.

It is known that in Special Relativity Theory the 4d force is used, which is not the same as 3d force, used in classical mechanics. Here, on the contrary, the forces are divided into two types:
1. Gravitational (inertial) or space-like force, which is directed along spatial axis;
2. Electrical or time-like force directed along the time axis.
Because we have equivalent calibrated units of mass and charge, mass of proton and charge of an electron, we can write the following set of equations:

F_r = F_t,
m_ra_r = qa_t; (q = m_t = m_rc³)
m_ra_r = m_rc³a_t = m_ta_t.

Charge:

From the last set of equations we can derive the charge of an electron, written in mechanical units:

q = m_rc³ = 0.04506711 kg*m³/s³ .

We can forget about the "coulomb" unit, but for reference here it is written in mechanical units:

1 C = 2.8128687E+17 kg*m³/s³,

Electric current:

I = Q/t.
1A=1C/s = 2.8128687E+17 kg*m³/s⁴.

Voltage, U:

1V=1W/A = 1J/s/A = 3.5550895E-18 s/m

Look! Voltage is a velocity along the time axis, i.e. [U] = s/m. You can compare it with space-like velosity: [v] = m/s. Difference of electric potentials is measured in the same units: [j₁-j₂] = s/m, which is also characterized as time-like velocity.

Electric field strength, E:

Electric field strength is the time-like acceleration: [E] = 1V/m = 3.5550895E-18 s/m². Compare it with space-like acceleration: [a_r] = m/s²

Indeed, F=qE, which reminds us the upper written formula F=ma. But now the electric field strength is measured in simple mechanical units: [E] = s/m², time-like acceleration.

Permittivity of empty space, e₀:

The value of electric constant can be defined with the help of the formula:

e₀ = q²/(2ahc) = 7.005637E+23 kg*m³/s⁴

Electric flux.

The flux of electrical field strength is measured in seconds! The ideas of N.A. Kozyrev are realized here. He spoke, that massive objects absorb the time. And we have received here the analogous picture: one charge absorbs the time; other charge emits the time. Somebody wrote that that was the hypothesis of R. Feynman. Let’s calculate the flow of E-field from the elementary charge, and we’ll know the difference of time readings between physical vacuum and electron.

T = F_E = q/e₀ = 6.432979E-26 s.

The time reading of elementary charge with other sign will be negative. That is, the positive elementary charge always on 6.432979E-26 seconds outstrips the coordinate time, physical vacuum time. The negative charge, on the contrary, is always late by the same microscopic fraction of a second. This difference in elementary charge time and coordinate time can be compared with Compton time determined from:

mc² = hn, t = 1/n, t = h/mc².

In the case of proton we have:

t = h/mc² = 4.40775E-24 s.

Fine structure constant, a:

The ratio of Compton time, which is the length measured in seconds along the spatial coordinate, to the charge time, which is the height of a peak in vacuum is:

t / T = 68.51799988 = (2a)^-1, exactly!

This result is obvious, because all formulae in SI continue to be valid, and their outlook in new units sheds the light onto many old riddles. It is clear now, that the fine structure constant, multiplied by two is a tangent of an angle formed by legs of a time triangle.

The preliminary analysis has shown, that the above-mentioned forces can be written down as 4-vector of force, just as it was made in SRT, but there it was made without the account of the charge. It is also interesting to use these units in Maxwell and Schrödinger equations. It is the usual substitution.

What is electromagnetic wave?

The electromagnetic waves are wide-spreading fluctuations and twisting of time in space. Polarized light is a rotating fluctuations of time, etc.

Why don't physicists use such units as m, s, kg, instead V, A, C, T, ...? Mechanical units reflect reality. Electricity and magnetism can be interpreted in more understandable language. Perhaps I am not the first person to see this, so if you have seen F=qa_t, anywhere else, please refer me to the author. Has anyone said: "Charge is time inertia", before me?

The error in CGS system.

I don’t believe to be the first. Indeed the first was Gauss. However, at that time it was impossible to go the above shown way. In the Gaussian system CGS_Q (centimeter, gram, second) the electrical units were introduced with the help of Coulomb law, F=q₁q₂/r², and with the equation, F=G*m₁m₂/r². It is clear that these equations are not symmetric, and, as a result, the unit of charge received the fractional dimensionality: [Q] = cm^3/2 g^1/2 / s.

Obviously, such fractional units did not reflect reality. Moreover, the representation of electrical units in different CGS systems is incorrect methodologically, because the gravity and electricity are put in an asymmetrical form. In the formula for gravitational force, F=G*m₁m₂/r², there is a dimensional gravitational constant G; in the formula for electrical force, F=q₁q₂/r², there is no such constant, but there is a dimensionless coefficient “1”. It is this coefficient “1”, which must take/give some part of dimensionality on itself and make them integer (non-fractional). It would be correctly thus:

1. F = m₁m₂/r², F = q₁q₂/r², or thus:
2. F = G*m₁m₂/r², F = k*q₁q₂/r².

In the first case we lose the dimension of mass. It follows from the solution of the system of the equations: F=m²/r², F=ma. The unit of mass is expressed through: [m] = [r²a] =1m³/s². Mass becomes not base, but derived quantity. If we use meter and second as standards, then new standard of mass would be 1/(6.67*10^-11) times bigger than former. The unit of mass would be: 1 unit of mass = 1.5*10¹⁰ kg = 1m³/1s². New unit of force would also be bigger. Dimension of force would be: dim F = L⁴/T⁴. Dimension of a charge would be equal to the dimension of mass: dim Q = dim M = L³/T²; dimension of electrical current would be: dim I = L³/T³.

The second case reflects SI. Mass remains the base quantity, and as the result, there appears the electric current, as new base quantity.

On the contrary, here we had kept the mass as the base quantity. Mass is spatial inertia, charge is temporal inertia. Proton and electron are equivalent particles in the 4d lattice, but move under different angles relative to our space and time coordinate axes. This is why the investigation of the system SI_M is necessary for the study of space-time-matter properties.

Comparative table.

The comparative table of dimensionalities of some quantities in systems SI, SI_M, CGS_symmetric, is presented below.

Quantity	SI	SIM F=qE=mtat F=mrar	CGS(sym.)
length	L	L	L
time	T	T	T
velocity	L/T	L/T	L/T
acceleration	L/T2	L/T2	L/T2
mass	M	M	M
force	ML/T2	ML/T2	ML/T2
electric current	I	ML3/T4	L3/2M1/2/T2
electric charge, q	IT	ML3/T3	L3/2M1/2/T
permittivity, e0	T4I2/L3/M	ML3/T4	-
electric field strength, E	LM/T3/I	T/L2	M1/2/T/L1/2
electric potential, j	L2M/T3/I	T/L	L1/2M1/2/T
electric flux, FE	L3M/T3/I	T	L3/2M1/2/T
electric induction, D	TI/L2	ML/T3	M1/2/T/L1/2
permeability, m0	LM/T2/I2	T6/M/L5	(non-coherent)
magnetic induction, B	M/T2/I	T2/L3	M1/2/L1/2/T
magnetic flux, FB	L2M/T2/I	T2/L	M1/2L3/2/T
magnetic field strength, H	I/L	ML2/T4	M1/2/L1/2/T

Some conclusions:

It was shown that the representation or expression of such physical quantities as charge and mass in the same identical units is not contradictory. That means that in 4d space lattice in microlevel the charge and mass are the same entities but we, 3-d macro-beings, see them differently.

Dimensionality of the system of units is very closely connected with the dimensionality of the Universe on its different scales. We say that we live in 3d space and time. Space and time intervals can be measured in the same units, for example, in seconds. Are spatial second and time second equivalent for us? Certainly, not. If we could jump in future at the distance equal to one second, we would not see much difference, but if you could jump to the right or to the left at the distance equal to one second, you would find yourself far from the Earth, may be much closer to the Moon. By the way, we live at the Earth’s surface, and our space coordinates are also non-equivalent. We can easily move along the horizontal axis, but we cannot move along vertical axis without support. The rates of watches on the ends of one-meter horizontal rod are equal, but the rates of watches on the ends of the same vertical rod are not equal. This difference is very small. If it would be much greater, then we would measure the horizontal length in one sort of units, and the vertical length in other units.

But the situation in the micro-world is quite different. Three-dimensional space and time transforms into 4d spacetime with equivalent axes. And in this section we have show that the elementary charge and elementary mass are equivalent properties in the microworld.

And here is the main conclusion:
Charge is the time-like inertia. Mass is the space-like inertia. If you unite space and time into space-time, then you must unite mass and charge into mass-charge.

Other topics of Space Genetics

This page was updated: 24 January 2001, by Ivan Gorelik

Extremely urgent note, 2009.

Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!

There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders.

Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop/liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...

It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces.

Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, in the form of a circle, where there is the critical magnetic field. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the circle. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. As a result the hole is growing.

The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass slightly more than one thousand masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working near this region. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are seven times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole.

According to publications, LHC will create microscopic black holes. Most theorists suggest that these black holes will disappear, because of the Hawking evaporation. However, we know that there are several theories of gravity. Some theories did not even admit the existence of black holes. In addition, there are several theories of black holes. Therefore, confidence in the classical theory of black holes and in a process of evaporation of black holes is very poor.

For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed.

In early September, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after three months of analysis of the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, and after the analysis of space observations, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents.

Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, - the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, are we have the right to touch the particle of God?

Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. Part of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of neutron hole, and another part will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the released shell.

Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will evaporate almost immediately as a result of energetic collisions with atmospheric particles. Such evaporating magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable.

Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.

In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. It is possible that this magnetic hole is decaying now.

It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure.

Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to the magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars.

Particle's collision energies and bombs:

Several eV - chemical bomb;
Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
Several TeV - hyper bomb.

Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical structure of matter.
Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of matter.
Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a field.

Scientific crime.

Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more than 1000 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 1000 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter.

Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about one thousand of nucleon masses. Such embryos of neutron star can by made in collider.

Not long ago the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil?

Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are not the material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time elements, strings. 

Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful Large Hadron Collider.

Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are preparing the global terrorist crime now.

Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 1 TeV must be prohibited by the international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre?

Some documents and links.

In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists/promoters of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for the lack of funds, I could not did it then.

In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution.

In December, I sent the Letter to the President of Russia. In January, I received an answer in which it was stated that my letter was forwarded to the Russian Academy of Sciences.

In December, I sent the Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner".

In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters, which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile.

Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?

Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic magnetic traps were already created, and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.

Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments.

Magnetic Hole. Pictures.

Read the frequently updated page
Save Yourself - The Business Offer
for more news, links and developments of this topic.