In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report
"What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?"
at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow.
But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution.
In September 2008 I came to the conclusion that the experiment at LHC, is indeed a serious threat. I have come to this conclusion after attempts to create a model of particles that can absorb the ordinary matter, surrounding us. I use the Steady State model of the Universe, which is different from the traditional model, the theory of Big Bang. It turns out to be that in the Steady State model, the probability of global catastrophe is higher than it follows from the Big Bang theory. This is due to the fact that space-time at the micro level is different in these models. My model is based on the strictly ordered space-time lattice, and particles are the defects and the sets of defects, which are the internal elements of this lattice. In the Big Bang model the space-time at micro-level is a vacuum foam, and the substance particles, colliding with high energies, are independent, torn out from space-time. It is a quark-gluon plasma, living independently in the space-time. In the Steady State model , we have a lot of constant values: the Hubble constant, the temperature of the background radiation, the relationships between the average specific energy of the physical vacuum, the baryonic matter, and the leptons. In the Big Bang model these values can change with time.
29.11.2008. Ivan Gorelik Yu, darkenergy@yandex.ru
Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop / liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...
Neutron drop is the object which looks as a drop. It is formed from neutrons with the same orientation of spins, and with a density similar to the nuclear density. Pauli exclusion principle does not work because the neutrons do not have the same spatial coordinates, and the drop may be in such rotation that neutrons have different orbital moments.
Neutron hole is the object which looks as an infinitely thin coil with many circular loops. Each loop creates a magnetic field which is equivalent to magnetic field of one neutron. Pauli exclusion principle does not work because the neutrons are grouped in Cooper pairs.
Magnetic hole is the object like a neutron hole, but the difference is that the neutron capture is accompanied by the release of neutrino, and the proton capture is accompanied by the release of a positron. Pauli exclusion principle does not work because magnetic hole is made of bosons.
The most plausible calculations were made for the neutron hole. The most realistic object is a magnetic hole. It is clear that numerical estimates for these objects will be different, but the difference is small, with numerical factor which is close to unity. Further we shell use the term magnetic hole, with a numerical evaluation of the neutron hole.
(For a more precise calculation, look the page, written couple months later.)
Let's suppose that the neutron hole is similar to the superconducting coil of n turns, where n is the number of neutrons in it. Binding energy is calculated successively: for two, three, ..., n neutrons within the neutron hole.The binding energy of n-th neutron with the neutron hole is equal to the energy, that can be spent in order to turn one-loop coil at 90o relatively the the coil, containing (n-1) loops.
n=2; E2=pB;The total binding energy, Etotal
will be equal to the sum of all right parts of upper equations.
Etotal =pB+p(2B)+...p((n-1)B)=(n-1)npB/2.
Specific energy can be received dividing Etotal
by the number of neutrons.
e = Etotal/n = (n-1)pB/2.
The binding energy of the 2-loop coil:
E2=pB=m0pI2R/2. Given that we are aware of the magnetic moment of neutrons (p=0,966e-26 Äæ/Òë), the last formula can be transformed toLet's define n, at which the neutron binding energy is equal to the rest mass of the
neutron.
Etotal/c2
= nmneutron,,
n=(n-1)npB/2/(c2mneutron)
,
(n-1)=2c2mneutronm/(pB),
n=2c2mneutron/(pB) + 1,
n=2c2mneutron/ E2 + 1 = 1055.
This corresponds roughly to one TeV.
Notice that the LHC collider will give 7 times higher, which means that a magnetic
trap can be created at the collider.
Some other values can also be easily received.
The minimal radius of the neutron hole, Rmin
= 4×10-16 m, is approximately equal to doubled Compton radius of the neutron. For comparison:
Schwarzschild radius of
1055 neutrons, compressed into a black hole, is 35 orders smaller,
Rshv = 2,6×10-51 m.
Assuming that the maximum magnetic induction is the induction of the minimum possible
neutron hole, Bmax
=3×1016 Òë, we conclude, that the further absorption of the substance
leads to the hole's radius increase.
Let's read an excerpt from an article[1] "The safety of the LHC":
"The Universe as a whole conducts more than 10 million million LHC-like experiments
per second. The possibility of any dangerous consequences contradicts what astronomers
see - stars and galaxies still exist". But this is cheating! Stars explode.
Moreover, the frequency of the first explosions of new stars is approximately
equal to the frequency of the deaths of civilization, if we assume that
civilizations are evolving near the every 15th star for a few billion years.
Figuratively speaking, the outbreak of a nova or supernova is mourning march for
the dying civilization. Compare: if you take a village with 1000 inhabitants,
each of which lives approximately one hundred years, then you will note that the
mournful marches in that village sounds about 10 times per year. In addition,
there are strong indications that between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter was the
planet, Phaeton...
Reading the article further, we can notice that the group "LHC Safety
Assessment Group" has poor imagination. They investigated the possibility of
creation only for four objects: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic
monopoles, the vacuum bubbles. And almost every item was dismissed by the
comparison with cosmic rays.
Indeed, the particles with much more energy, comparatively to LHC collisions
energy, arrive from the outer space. But these processes can not be compared.
The particles formed in the LHC beams can have the any small velocity, but the
particles formed by the collision of cosmic particles with the atmosphere, will
have only relativistic speeds.
The more correct comparison is here:
a. the slow neutron can be captured by nucleus, and the atomic mass of this
nucleus will increases by one;
b. the neutron with the energy of several TeV, destroys the nucleus.
Therefore, the neutron hole, formed at the collider, is expected to grow. The neutron hole, formed by the collision of cosmic particles with the atmosphere particle, will evaporate immediately after next set of successive collisions, forming a heavy shower of secondary particles. These showers are observable.
Observational objects, which are associated with black holes, in many cases
contain accretion disks, and along the axis - the radio emissions. These
emissions can be understood so that the magnetic trap captures only "edible"
matter, but emits streams of charged particles: electrons, positrons, and
possibly, proton and antiproton.
Nova star is actually not new, and it sometimes undergo the successive
explosions with a period of about 20 years. It was discovered, that these
repeating novae are closely binary systems; a smaller companion of which is a
compact neutron star, moving on the surface of a larger partner, and the smaller
companion devours the bigger one. It is probable that this small companion, the
neutron star, is also a magnetic trap. Despite the fact, that its density is
much higher than the density of big star, it does not sink deeply. The powerful
magnetic field is constantly pushes the neutron star out of the diamagnetic
plasma of the large companion.
Thus, we can conclude that pulsars, magnetars etc. are magnetic traps.
Many observable objects, which were called the black holes, are not in
reality the black holes, because of one very important reason. Classical black
holes should not have a magnetic field. But the majority of the candidates on
black holes have enormous/huge magnetic fields. Sometimes these objects are now
called «Magnetospheric eternally collapsing objects» (MECO)
But in reality they are rather the magnetic traps. MECO are more plausible than
black holes, and magnetic traps are more plausible than MECO.
There are several unresolved issues in astrophysics: the existence of radio emissions, gamma-ray bursts, strange behavior of accretion disks, the origin of cosmic rays of high energies; the process of collapse of a supernova. These problems can be solved much easier if we assume, that some observation objects contain magnetic traps at their centers.
P. 56. Such instability may occur in a sufficiently strong electric field.
As was shown by calculation, the pion condensation occurs near the nucleus with
the Z number of protons, with Z more than 1500.
P. 60. Another important conclusion relates to the possibility of the existence
of ultradense neutron nuclei, which will be discussed in the next section. If
such nuclei exist, then there must be a neutron stars of all sizes. In this
case, the equilibrium neutron state is achieved without the help of gravity.
P. 62. Perhaps the hyperdense nucleus can be formed in the collisions of heavy
ions with energies of several hundred MeV per nucleon.
Let's repeat the phrase "... there must be a neutron stars of all sizes..."
Any? But that is the global catastrophe, which can be made at a collider, but
Migdal did not say about it then, in public! Our calculation shows a minimum -
1055 masses of neutrons. And this limit is achievable at the LHC.
Academician Migdal's book was written 30 years ago. It speaks about a pion
condensation, creating the potential well in the pion field, the restructuring
of the vacuum in the strong fields.
And we assumed now the creation of potential pit (the magnetic trap) in the
critical magnetic field in the result of collisions at the collider, and growing
by capturing the ordinary matter.
Microscopic magnetic traps can be created in one of the colliders, because
physicists working there, can not be stopped. Microscopic magnetic traps will
rush to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. With time,
they will merge together into a single powerful and rapidly growing magnetic
trap. The thin shell of the Earth with all of us, will be ejected into outer
space, but the bulk of the Earth will turn into a current circuit of 6 meters
radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is equal to
9 millimeters.
This 6-meter infinitely thin disk will be probably surrounded by the cooling
down and diminishing torus, made of neutron fluid. Torus is in the state of
constant "perpendicular rotation", along the magnetic induction lines. The
alleged frequency of rotation is 734 Hz. For comparison: the frequency of
outbreaks of the fastest pulsar is 719 Hz.
Further, the magnetic trap and will rush to the Sun and drop at its surface, but does not sink, because the magnet is pushed out of diamagnetic plasma. Then they will form a close rotating stellar pair, and the 6-meters magnetic trap will rapidly absorb the matter of the Sun. When the radius of the magnetic trap will be equal to 158 meters, its mass will be equal to 1/20 of the solar masses. This will be the culminating moment, when two radiuses "collides", - the radius and Schwarzschild and the radius of the magnetic trap. Part of the substance inside of the magnetic trap will become inside the black hole, and as a result, the explosion happens. Part of the Sun will be ejected, and it will look from afar, like a nova. If the remnants of magnetic trap has not been subjected to kick out, it will again absorb the substance of Sun, and again in twenty years, after reaching the critical mass, 1/20 of the mass of the Sun. Repeated explosions may continue until the Sun is almost finished. Through the hundreds or thousands of years in its place will twinkle a neutron star, surrounded by the torus, filled by the remnants of the Sun.
Magnetic traps are probably observable. The system of rings is visible in the remnants of supernova SN 1987A. See, how these rings are changing over time, - please click [4]. These rings lie on the hyperboloid. Imagine it, so that the rings were belting this hyperboloid. And now look at the electron [5], moving on the hyperboles in the coordinates x, ict. SN 1987A and the electron look alike.
According the recent publications [6-10] a new particle was discovered at the
Tevatron collider.
She lives ten times longer than it follows from the standard theory. It splits
into several muons, and therefore I called it "the muon hole", since its
properties are similar to the neutron hole. Discovery of such strange particle,
as the muon hole, tells us that at higher collision energies we can receive the
whole family of such particles. What would be the next: a particle of God, or a
magnetic trap Devil?
1. The safety of the LHC.
http://public.web.cern.ch/public/en/LHC/Safety-en.html
2. Magnetospheric eternally collapsing objects
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetospheric_eternally_collapsing_objects
3. AB Migdal, "The Search for Trooth", M. 1978.
4. Supernova 1987A.
http://www.spacetelescope.org/news/html/heic0704.html
5. Model of the electron. Program.
http://darkenergy.narod.ru/SR2007.exe
6. Study of multi-muon events produced in p-pbar collisions at sqrt (s) = 1.96
TeV http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.5357
7. Igor Ivanov on the article collaboration CDF
http://elementy.ru/news?chapter=436816&newsid=430901
8.
http://dorigo.wordpress.com/2008/10/31/cdf-publishes-multi-muons/
9.
http://www.math.columbia.edu/~woit/wordpress/?p=1045
10. http://elementy.ru/news/430901
11. My web-site.
Appendix 1.
The evolution of the internal ring of SN 1987A.
... Photos ...
Appendix 2.
...skipped...
Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations.
Who are you, dear reader:
"a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?
Magnetic
trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic
magnetic traps were already created,
and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.
Arguments, proving that "The LHC will
lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist";
"We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe".
Religious and mystic arguments.
You are here: The failed report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?"
The Letter to the President of Russia.
The Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation.
Read the frequently updated page Save Yourself - the Business Offer for more news, llinks and developments of this topic.
To index of Space Genetics