FAREWELL
"... Nor does anyone know what it is that he will earn on the morrow, nor does anyone know in what land he is to die. Verily with God is all knowledge and He is acquainted (with all things)." (31:34)
Time went by. Everything changed. And
one day we found ourselves to be the "old" ones in the student club. The
board consisted of young people, that hadn't even started university when
we founded the club. Another lesson: Everybody is replaceable. But we were
happy, that the community stayed alive.
And it was true, we did all grow older.
We graduated and started families. Everybody went his way and we hardly
saw each other anymore. Mohamed
and I had in the meanwhile become parents of two daughters. Tasnim ("Tasneem")
and Yusra turned our life upside down. When
Tasnim was born - after some waiting and a miscarriage - Mohamed and I
were grateful and happy. Right after her birth, an experience that Mohamed
had shared with me, he whispered the Azzan, the Muslim call for prayer,
into Tasnims ear: "God is greater, God is greater, I testify that there
is no God but God, I testify that Muhammad is His messenger, come to prayer,
come to success, God is greater, there is no God but God."
The name "Tasnim" is taken from Qur'an.
It is the name of a spring, out of which the believers will drink in paradise.
Soon after I was pregnant "again".
My family was shocked. Yet the age difference between my daughters is one
and a half years. Exactly the same as between me and my brother. But obviously
the times have changed.
And again it was a girl, who Mohamed
tenderly welcomed with Azzan. We named her Yusra. That name is taken
from Qur'an as well. It means something like :making easy or light". God
lightens our burden.
Mohamed and I were happy with our two
daughters. But my mother turned out to be quite disappointed, that it was
another girl. "Girls will have more problems than boys. You probably want
them to wear a head scarf when they grow up?" Generally with the birth
of my daughters I found myself in the crossfire of critics. When I became
Muslim, I had been told: "That's your life. Do with it, what you like."
Now I heard: "You don't want to cause hardship in your children's life,
do you?"
Of course neither me nor Mohamed wanted
to cause hardship in our children's lives. Actually we hadn't thought much
before about what it means to have children. I had never intended to leave
my Masters certificates in the drawer and spend my time with house keeping.
And now all of a sudden we were responsible for these two little girls.
So we began to ask ourselves, what the future of our children would look
like.
Would they one day freely testify:
"There is no God but God, and Muhammad is His messenger."? Or would they
be "normal" Germans once out of the house? Would they grow up to teenagers,
that don't belong anywhere, as my parents had prophesied before I married?
Like so many other children I had met in the mosques?
Thanks God I am able to take care of
my children. I decided to stay at home with my daughters. Which didn't
please my father at all. He thinks, I am wasting my abilities. Actually
I am asked a lot why I am not working. To be a housekeeper and mother is
not appropriate for an educate young European woman. A career is considered
by women an essential part of living. The micro census of April 1994 shows
for Germany, that 40.4 percent of married and 44.1 percent of unmarried
mothers of a child less than three years of age do have a job. The motherly
type isn't asked for anymore in our society. For years the psychologist
by the name of Ute Erhardt is on top of the bestseller list with
the title: "Gute Maedchen kommen in den Himmel, boese ueberall hin" (Good
girls go to heaven, bad girls go everywhere). And the radio plays "Girls
just wanna have fun!"
Family is loosing its place as "normal"
way of life. Relationships have ceased to be about offspring. In German
relationships "Love" and "Care" are rated higher than "Family". Should
the relationship unexpectedly not turn out to be harmonic but rather generate
stress, it is dissolved. In the U.S.A. already every second marriage is
divorced. About half of the U.S children will experience the divorce of
their parents while they are still minors. Those children will be more
likely to divorce than children who have grown up in healthy marriages,
when they grow up. So numbers are spiraling up. But who cares? We have
become flexible. Even the complete abolishment of marriage itself is discussed
in some places. Alternative ways of life are propagated. In France about
35% of the children are already born out of wedlock. In the U.S.A. more
than a third of the adults are unmarried. The group of homosexuals e.g.
is big enough to be a high value customer group aimed at by advertisement
experts. An estimated 10 percent of U.S. men and 6 percent of U.S. women
is leading a homosexual life. A kind of belief in fate. Educated people
do believe - without any plausible scientific reason - to be biological
predestinated for a certain sexual desire. "That's how I am. It's not my
fault!" Thanks to the media, sex has become a public affair. Fetishists,
transvestites, everybody articulates himself in uncountable talk shows,
where the How?, When?, Where?, With whom? and Why? is discussed. Before
you die, you should have seen and tried everything there is. The more exotic,
the better. We have learned
to view naked human skin as something completely natural. So we need some
more to get excited about. Attractiveness is everything in society. People
showing their body are more accepted than "buttoned-up" fellows.
How can you raise a child in an Islamic
way in such en environment?
A good question! But the question I
am asked over and over is put slightly differently: "How can you want to
raise your child in such an environment in an Islamic way?"Isn't it the
children, who suffer the most of our crumbling social structures? German
therapists label children growing up without father as "risk and problem
group". Children from one-parent-families more often show psychological
disorders, get bad grades at school or take drugs. Girls are more often
molested and there are more teenage pregnancies. In the U.S.A. nearly two
thirds of rapists, three quarters of teenage murderers and a comparable
high percentage of young incarcerates grew up without a father.
I do think about my children. I don't
want my daughters to grow up to become part of the 20 percent of Germans,
who feel lonely in this world without stability, where everybody depends
only on himself. I want them to feel accepted as they are. Without having
to undress for this. The over stressing of sexuality in our society causes
a lot of women to feel sexually exploited, while looking for love and acceptance.
More important than an attractive body should be the development of a healthy
personality. I don't say we have to deny our bodies, but I do not support
Western exhibitionism. We don't need unlimited sexual freedom, but rather
community with other people. A hug as sign of friendship is becoming rare
in society. You can hardly kiss a child without making people think about
child abuse. And a man hugging another man is right away labeled "gay".
In a social science study a British
convert to Islam is quoted. He complains about the lack of human relations
in British society. Bodily contact is only possible with one's girlfriend.
Muslims on the other hand view the whole subject a lot more natural. They
pray side by side, shoulders and feet touching. And they greet each other
with handshakes and hugs. Even men.
I wish for my daughters that they might
develop self-confidence as a woman, independent of the expectations of
Western performance oriented society. That they grow up to become responsible
persons, who are aware of their environment and show interest for other
things but their personal advantages.
For me Islam is the better alternative.
Of course my mother also has a point
in prophesying, that an Islamic education in Germany will cause problems
for us and our children. It is true that the situation for Muslims in Germany
- actually all over Europe - isn't too easyy.
It starts already with the choice of
name. According to Hadeeth it is the duty of parents, to pick a nice name
for their children. Unfortunately German officials hardly ever share the
parent's opinion about the beauty of a name. As well for Tasnim as for
Yusra we had to bring a certificate from the Egyptian embassy stating that
these are names. With Yusra I was advised to choose a less exotic name
or at least pick a German middle name. After all, so many marriages with
foreigners are divorced, and then the poor children have to live with their
exotic names all their life. At
least the state accepted our choice of names. That is not always so. Among
our acquaintances a boy was named Tarek after the historical general Tarek.
A common Arabic name, that wasn't accepted by the German officials. Only
the court allowed the name. And
a little girl was allowed the name Manal only under the condition that
the Middle name would clearly show the gender of the child. Names, that
according to German law fulfill this condition, are e.g. written down in
the list of Common First Names in our Family Book (An official German collection
of family papers like marriage or birth certificates.) Among the names
listed there are e.g. Urte, Gesche, Fokke or Huschke, all "common" and
"clear" in gender matters. (For those that don't know German, these names
are all but "common" or "clear" :-) )
Then we have the problem of kindergarten
and school. Motivated teachers try, to teach Muslim children the Western
way of life. Neutrality of school in regard to the religious up-bringing
of the children by the parents doesn't work with Islam. The education
bases on the Western ideas and values. Over and over Muslim parents have
to go to German court to have it confirm that Muslim children at least
can't be forced to participate at mixed gender swimming classes and that
Muslim girls can wear their headscarf in class.
And after graduation professional life
starts off. In regard to jobs the perspectives of Muslim girls are really
bad. A Turkish girl was rejected as nurse with the argument, she couldn't
work with scarf for hygienic reasons. The same hospital did of course employ
nuns in their attire. A German Muslima didn't get unemployment money because
by wearing the scarf she herself made it difficult to find a job
for her. She had to go to court to prove her right of receiving unemployment
money. Even shop assistants with scarf are considered to drive away customers.
Well, at least a career in cleaning offices will be open to my daughters,
once they finish college.
But my mother is wrong to think, this kind of discrimination is only concerning women. A German Muslim student was kicked out of his job as guard because of his belief. He was considered a security risk. A German Muslim university graduate, was considered "hard to employ" by German officials. He was asked instead, if he wouldn't like to spy on his fellow believers. And an Arabic scientist was denied an assistant job and a chance to get a Ph.D. at a German university. The professor told him: "If you would be from Tel Aviv or Boston, there wouldn't be any problem. But you have to understand. This kind of research might be used in weapon technology."
Then there are all the additional problems
of Muslim daily life in Germany. For example the problem of slaughtering.
Islam prescribes - as well as Judaism - that during slaughtering the name
of God has to be called upon and the blood has to leave the animal. Of
course the Jewish community is allowed to slaughter according to Mosaic
law in Germany. And of course in summer 1996 a German court in Munich has
denied the Muslim community a comparable permit. The judge argued, it wasn't
necessary to torture animals out of religious reasons. Rather believers
could forgo meat at all. And again of course this ruling only applies to
Muslims, not to Jews. As if it would make a difference for the animal,
if the name of God is called upon in Hebrew or Arabic.
But Islamic communities in Germany
just don't have any other juridical status than bowling clubs, as Ahmed
puts it Muslim kindergarten and schools are not financially supported by
the German state. Similar Christian or Jewish institutions are. And its
the same with hospitals or elderly homes. In some places it is complicated
to even get a Muslim funeral.
The acceptance of the Muslim community
as a corporations with public rights - comparable to the Christian and
Jewish communities - would surely help to solve many problems of
Muslims in German society. But the German state is far from granting Muslims
such a status. It would have to accept officially, that Islam is no longer
temporary in Germany, but there to stay. And what politician would want
to tell his voters, that they have to get used to headscarves and mosques
in their neighborhood?
Mosques are a complex subject for themselves.
Every Friday the neighbors of our mosque call the police around noon time,
as there are so many foreigners around. Of course those come to the Friday
prayers, what the police already knows. Only the neighbors don't seem to
have realized that yet. And once, when we picked up our car, that had been
removed from before another mosque, we were told by the pick-up service:
"Don't leave your car in front of the mosque again. Police always controls
there in Ramadan."
Mosques are hardly existing but in
back yards. You rarely get a construction permit. In Aachen when an Islamic
center was planned, a "Citizens movement against Islamic Violence and Terror"
spread flyers: "Important information for all Aachen citizens! Stop the
beginnings!"
In Soest the "Christian Center" (a
small political party) did do a poll on the same subject: "An Islamic Center
in Soest? The Islamization is marching ahead!"
Single cases? Unfortunately not. The research committee "Racism and hostility towards foreigners" of the European Parliament 1991 published an interesting report. It describes an "Islamophobie" in Belgium, "broad opposition against the construction of mosques in France" and "rejection, yes hostility" towards Islam in the United Kingdom. The mayor of Ishoj in Denmark 1987 wanted to stop any farther immigration of foreigners to Ishoj, under the assertion, the Turkish people were trying to "Khomeinisize" Ishoj.
"DIE WELT" (a famous German newspaper)
published on March 19th, 1994 a preview of a new book on Islam. The author
discusses Islamic fundamentalism in Europe. He talks about the "darkness
of fanatic shady characters, the night of prohibitions to think and compulsion
in belief, the hostility towards life and the denial of the world by black
disguised women." He mentions the "right of home" of the "inborn population
majority", who necessarily has to "defend" its rights against an "uncontrolled
mass immigration" that is "anyhow only peaceful in the beginning". Quote:
"Who would think, that a religion insisting from the very beginning on
reigning and not on being reigned, on the long run will be satisfied with
being the eternal number two?"
The prosecutors office comments this
on May 17th: "The text discusses in a critical way the fundamentalist
wing of Islam, which is neither part of the population as defined in paragraph
130 of the criminal law, neither a racial entity as defined in paragraph
131 of the criminal law. It is not calling to violent actions ...
The criminal law can't take the danger
of misinterpretation as the measure to define the borderline between right
and wrong."
Only one week later, on May 24th, the
Protestant Academy in Iserlohn made the following announcement to the press:
"Today we have to announce, that the Protestant Academy Iserlohn sees itself
forced to call off the Chritian-Islamic Forum on the subjects 'State Theory
- Human Rights - Economic Order', intended to take place from June 3rd-5th
1994, because of security problems. For about two weeks we have been receiving
daily threats from different origin and quality - beginning with demonstration
announcements and ending with references to violent actions. Some of them
could be verified as serious, while with others there still remains a factor
of uncertainty in regard to their seriousness."
The Germans don't like to be provoked.
And isn't it provocation, when we Germans out of pure love for our fellow
people allow those Muslims, to live in our country, and then those narrow-minded
stubborn Muslims, instead of gratefully accepting our modern way of life,
insist on their backwardness? One of my professors at university said to
me: "If a woman wears a headscarf, she wants to set a signal, that she
is better than me."
And how can that be? Isn't Europe undoubtedly
the queen of civilizations?
Now you are probably saying, what I
have heard many times: "The Muslims are to blame themselves. After all
they could adjust."
I ask you, what kind of logic is this
supposed to be? To blame is not society, which excludes the stranger? To
blame is the stranger himself, as he has the impudence to exist here? What
do you tell the other minorities? The Jews? The coloreds? The handicapped?
What do you tell my children? Germany
offers them the freedom to be as the others? How could they - with an Egyptian
father? With an Arabic name? Even if they - as my family still hopes -
should one day decide against being Muslim - may God prevent this from
happening - still they won't ever be the same as the others. But
here I am to blame as well. Why did I marry a foreigner in the first place?
Why did I get children with him? And then even chose an exotic name? Wasn't
I already warned at the municipal office when naming the children?
Germany is a democratic country. The
people determinate, who has a place here and who hasn't. Right now "foreigners"
are not all too popular - as in the rest of Europe. Over and over they
become victims of racist violence. "People coming from Third World countries
are more likely to become victims, as they are the most easy identified."
The report of the research committee
"Racism and hostility towards foreigners" of the European Parliament has
some interesting data. In the years 1987-1990 in France 19 North Africans
and one Romanian were murdered. "For at least half of the murders there
is no other reason but the desire to kill foreigners. In one case, where
six teenagers kicked a Tunisian father of six to death, one of the arresting
officers said: 'It shocked me the most, that they completely lack the understanding
of having done wrong.' ... In another incident, where a Moroccan teenager
just happened to be at the wrong place in the wrong time, the murderer
admitted a 'mistake'. He had believed to shoot a Chinese."
1996 German detectives find the same
lack of understanding with the mostly teenage racist violent criminals:
"They just have fun, beating people up."
Also the politicians lack understanding.
After all, in Germany the right of "Equality before the Law" is valid for
foreigners as well. And "should any person's right be violated by public
authority, recourse to the court shall be open to him". (Basic Law, Article
19, Paragraph 4) Besides that, the police can't be everywhere at the same
time.
In France there is at least an anti
racism law. But this law is interpreted in court in a restrictive way.
"It is supposed to protect "groups" of people against discrimination. The
courts reached a definition of "group", that excludes foreigners from being
such a group." "Law suits because of racist comments are turned down, as
the comments are in the limits of polemic or express a political opinion.
It is difficult, if not impossible, to prove a police officer guilty of
racist comments. On the other hand foreigners, who dare to insult a police
officer by calling him a "racist" or a "sale Francais" (dirty Frenchman)
are easily sentenced for racism."
"The difficulties of proof in cases
of racism are illustrated by the case of three North Africans, who wanted
to show, that two night clubs in Moulkins (Central France) choose their
guests according to racist criteria. A helpful journalist entered the clubs
wearing blue jeans and tie. The three young Arabs followed him wearing
elegant suits and ties, but were rejected. The prosecutor condemned their
behavior saying: 'You didn't do a research, but rather tried to provoke.
But in France provocateurs are thrown out of court.' "
Foreigners provoke by their bare existence.
They provoke, because they are different. A German Skinhead once stated
in a TV interview: "They just don't have 'Germanity'. " What that is supposed
to be? Who knows? Didn't German culture develop out of diverse influences?
Otherwise, wouldn't we still be living in caves, wearing fur and solve
disagreements with a bat? Well, at least in respect to the last point the
German Skinheads seem to have already returned to their roots...
But seriously, two sociologists, Lutz
Hoffmann and Herbert Even, have defined hatred of foreigners as "stubborn
insistence on the image of an ethnic and cultural homogeneous society in
Germany" and as a "refusal to learn". Cultural change in society, that
of cause is also initiated by foreign influences, can't be stopped at some
time in history to say: "That's it. That's German culture."
But not only Germany, all Europe starts,
to seclude itself. "Foreigners? That isn't discussed in the European Parliament.
All are foreigners there anyhow." That's what I was told at the election
campaign booth of the Christian Democratic Union party, when I asked for
brochures on the foreigner question. Poor Europe. The borders disappear,
but beyond Europe the world ends.
I didn't become Muslima, because I
don't like the developments in Western society. But the longer I am Muslim,
the clearer I see, how different things could be. I always have plead to
stay. When we leave, we give the chance away, to obtain a change. And this
I don't only regret as Muslima, but even more so as German. After all it
is my country shoveling her grave. Standstill is death!
But how do you explain this to a child?
How do you explain, why people insult him in the streets? How do you explain,
why the other children don't want to play with him? Why he isn't welcome
here? Do I have the right, to withhold the future from my children? I have
seen the children, who are sent from country to country, from language
to language, from school to school. That isn't a solution. Children need
a place, where they belong.
So we left, as long as we still had
the chance to do so. As long as the children were still young and hadn't
started school yet. As long as we can still get used to a new environment.
As long as Mohamed hadn't lost his last ties to his home country. Nine
years Germany is a long time!
One day we have packed our belongings
and moved to Egypt, the land of the pyramids, the land of the deserts and
of the dust. Here is where my children belong. My husband is Egyptian.
So are my children. As they are defined in Egypt through their father.
That they have a slightly lighter taint and hair, than the other children,
is considered pretty.
So what about me? Of course I am missing
my family, my friends, my language. And I am missing the green Sauerland
county, the cold winters and the clean streets. Egypt is Third World. Nobody
can deny that. But I think, Germany has already ceased to be my home, when
I became Muslima.
When we left Germany, my grandmother
said: "Your place is with your husband." She was the only one, considering
it natural for me to go. She was right. I belong, where my family belongs.
And my family belongs to Egypt. Here I am the mother of Tasnim and Yusra.
Many call me "Umm Tasnim" after my eldest child. Nobody cares, where I
am from. And as Muslima I am a sister in belief. I do have a place in society.
So I did finally turn Egyptian. Or maybe I still didn't...?
I think, it was for me the right decision as well, to leave Germany and move to Egypt. But only God alone knows that for sure.
I take refuge with God from the stoned
devil.
In the name of God, most gracious,
most merciful.
"By (the Token of) time (through the
ages),
verily, man is in loss,
except such as have faith, and do righteous
deeds, and (join together) in the mutual teaching of truth, and of patience
and constancy." (103)
Saddak Allahu Azeem