It will be many decades before scientists can bring
themselves to evaluate the mathematics on this site.
The scientific establishment are not likely to acknowledge the mathematics on this site because it reveals a major oversight on the part of researchers and observers.
Scientists enjoy a high status in society, and are granted the use of billions of dollars worth of equipment, like space probes, telescopes and computers.
With all this, they have overlooked a simple mathematical relationship in the orbits
of the Solar System, which is local, their own back yard.
If they have overlooked a fact that is under their very noses, they are not likely to admit it.
If they did, they would destroy the credibility of the sciences of
Astronomy and Cosmology. If it be shown that scientists are so wrong about that part of the Cosmos that is within easy reach, our Solar System, why would anyone give credence to what they postulate about the whole Universe ?
The implication of the Creation Equation for science is devastating, but since nobody knows about it, the damage done is zero, and the establishment has no need to worry.
|
This site presents scientists with proof, on their own terms, that the Solar System is Created, Genesis chp 1 v 1 is verified.
In the early decades of the nineteenth century the establishment we now refer to as 'Science' introduced mankind to a simple and revolutionary view of the origins of the Solar System.
In place of the long held religious belief that the System was caused to exist by a God, science claimed that it all came about by blind chance and the laws of physics.
The understanding of origins promulgated by scientists and held to be true by most of mankind for 200 years is shown to be incorrect by the mathematics in this document.
If the System came about by chance, it could not be ordered. The major orbits of the Solar System are shown to be in very close accord (0.2% or better) with a mathematical scheme.
It is not possible to explain these things by the invocation of chance.
For those readers who are unfamiliar with present scientific theories of the origin of the Solar System, an extract from Compton's Encyclopedia is
provided below. (The Nebular Hypothesis, or Cloud Theory). This theory has been proclaimed across the world, disseminated in documentary form by TV, promoted by the media, and by school text books.
Unfortunately, it is completely wrong.
The mathematics on this site constitutes a factual observation, and is just as real, indeed, more real, than a photograph or a telescope observation.
The math is readily verifiable by any scientist anywhere. It cannot be explained by current theory.
It is self evident that the Nebular Hypothesis cannot explain the precisely ordered Solar System described by the mathematical relationship demonstrated in the pages of this website.
Indeed, the theory insists the opposite to observed fact, the theory insists that the orbits must be in essence, random, determined only by the forces of gravity and chance, whereas in fact, the orbits are herein shown to be neatly ordered.
Scientists generally claim to be objective, with a high level of intellectual integrity. If this is true, then the scientific establishment must admit that the mathematics on this site presents them with an insurmountable problem.
The math on this site demonstrates that the Solar System is ordered, but more than this, it demonstrates the activity of intelligence.
It is a proven fact that the Solar System is precisely ordered, and therefore created. Unfortunately, this fact
will not be generally known for many years to come.
The media of the whole world teaches 'the Nebular Hypothesis' as if it were fact.
The section below is excerpted from Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia (CD-ROM)
Copyright The Learning Company, Inc.
It is noted that the CD-ROM contains no mention of the Creation Equation !
This little website cannot compete with such global promotion financed by the multinational media industry.
Origin of Solar System.
The Cloud Theory
Most scientific work has centered on the theory that the sun and planets were formed by the slow condensation of a gigantic cloud of dust and gas. Such clouds exist in the Milky Way and other galaxies. It seems reasonable that the gravitational attraction among the cloud's particles would gradually pull them together, and that as a mass increased its gravitational pull became greater. Thus, the observation of dust and gas clouds serves as a starting point for the nebular hypothesis of the solar system's formation.
As the cloud of gas and dust became more concentrated because of its own gravity, the particles would move closer to each other. They would also start swirling faster and faster around the center.
At first, all the particles would have their own direction and speed, although one direction would be favored. Through constant collisions they would slow down and change direction until a swirling disk slowly would be formed.
Each collision would cause the particles to lose a little of their energy of motion and become heated. As a particle lost energy, it would move closer to the center of the disk. At the same time, its speed around the center would increase. The idea is similar to the movement of water going down a drain. Water far from the drain does not seem to swirl, but near the center of the drain it moves in a small whirlpool. In the forming solar system, this central whirlpool became the sun. It was surrounded by a rotating disk of gas and dust, somewhat like the rings around Saturn.
The theory suggests that a second and a third stage then took place. Other centers of concentration began to develop. Some of these became the planets, others the moons that circle the planets. Several theories have been suggested to explain planetary formation, but none is completely satisfactory.
Most scientists believe that the nebular hypothesis is basically correct. But many details have not yet been explained in terms of this theory.
----------------------------------------------------------
Excerpted from Compton's Interactive Encyclopedia
Copyright © 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997 The Learning Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|
The math is factual and accurate. It is not numerology.
There are three possible explanations.
1) It is due to chance, the Nebular Hypothesis is valid.
In this event, the odds against it are so huge that it could not happen twice in the whole history of the known universe. The Solar System must therefore be regarded as unique, and special.
A unique and special Solar System is anathema to scientists. This explanation is not acceptable.
2) It is a natural Law of Physics.
In this event, all Solar Systems throughout the entire known universe must obey the same law.
This would mean that all Solar Systems are the same. Again, this is anathema to Science.
This explanation is not acceptable.
3) It is not natural.
This is actually the historical explanation. For most of history, humanity has accepted that the world is artificial, ie Created. This is actually the best explanation for the 'intelligent' content of the math.
It is the explanation I go with, but again, it is anathema to science.
This appears to exhaust all possible explanations, none are acceptable to science.
Can anyone suggest another possibility ?
|