Concentrations of Galaxies & Quasars
To better understand this page one must read: The Essence of Time & Age of Universe
In the following set of pictures one can see the dependence of visible concentrations of galaxies and quasars from the conventional distance to object in the homogeneous Universe. It is supposed in this work that large clusters of galaxies are distributed uniformly in universe, but we can see non-homogeneous distribution because of the constant loss of information in the universe. As a result of losing of information, the universe has conventional and real ages, and conventional and real length of big circumference. The several cases of geometry are shown here.
One and the same galaxy in different time epoch is shown
as:
One and the same galaxy, situated on the different poles
of closed Universe, and with equal time readings is shown by:
Here is the case of closed Universe with identical opposite points. That is one and the same galaxy on both poles of Universe. (Imagine that on the Earth there is no Europe, Asia, Africa, but there are two America; there is no South Pole, but there is two North Pole.) On the bottom graph one can see the real (or invisible) distance between one and the same galaxy. On the middle graph one can see one and the same galaxy in time evolution and visible (or conventional) distances between "main solution" of galaxy and its "ghosts".
In this case we have the following values of red shift, zi,
for maximums of concentrations of galaxies and for minimums of concentrations
of quasars: z0=0.52, z1=1.82, z2=3.83,
z3=7.08...
and the following values of zj for minimums of concentrations
of galaxies and for maximums of concentrations of quasars, and other exotics,
such as supervelocities and so on: z1=1.11; z2=2.71;
z3=5.26; z4=9.40... It is clear that quasars are usual
galaxies, but we can see them near the poles of Universe, and consequently
they looks very brightly and can have extremely large dispersion of z because
of tangential red shift on the pole.
In the next picture one can see the closed Universe with non-identified opposite points.
Maxims of galaxies concentration, minima of exotics: z(0)=0.252218; z(1)=0.79833;
z(2)=1.44554; z(3)=2.24179; z(4)=3.23975; z(5)=4.50320; z(6)=6.11201; z(7)=8.16745;
z(8)=10.7988... Multiple images of one and the same galaxy, for
example: z= 0.25; 1.44; 3. 24...;
From the opposite side of the sky we'll see the several more "ghosts" of
the same galaxy, but living in different time epoch: z= 0.79; 2.24; 4.50...
This is one more method to define the value of Hubble constant.
Minima of concentration of the galaxies, maxims of exotics. z(0)=0; z(1)=0.51573; z(2)=1.10632; z(3)=1.82195; z(4)=2.71189; z(5)=3.83373; z(6)=5.25868; z(7)=7.07657; z(8)=9.40175... If on the pole there is a dust or gas then we'll see the same absorption lines in all objects behind that pole. I have no statistics, but this is one more method to define the value of Hubble constant.
One more interesting case: One and the same observer is on the poles of the closed Universe, and is extended on equator. It is possible that time pole corresponds to space equator in this model.
In this case we have the following values of red shift, zi, for maximums of concentrations of galaxies and for minimums of concentrations of quasars: z1=1.82, z2=7.08... And the following values of zj for minimums of concentrations of galaxies and for maximums of concentrations of quasars, and other exotics, such as supervelocities and so on: z1=2.71; z2=9.40...
One of exotic cases is shown here. You can see the observer in this case only after two round world trip about this model. In the general case one and the same observer can be find only in one of n images of this model. This model is hard one, but our Universe, with it's clusters, groups of galaxies, is not much simpler. This model has many exotic consequences, for example: Our Sun can be situated in many observable galaxies... We live in Milky Way, in Andromeda, and in some others galaxies, simultaneously...
Here there is a figure containing all upper graphs together. At the right side of this figure there are galaxies-littlemen with synchronized watches. The evolution pictures will be quite different.
The green graph is the most appropriate to observational dates and to the matter density and to CBR temperature, calculated in this work.
To index of Space Genetics,
Last updated: 17 February 2002 by Ivan Gorelik
Extremely urgent note, 2009.
Attention! Magnetic trap of Devil!
There is a very big probability that magnetic trap will kill us all, if we will not stop powerful colliders.
Magnetic trap is an object, unifying hypothetical objects, connected primarily by magnetic forces: neutron drop/liquid; neutron hole; magnetic hole ...
It is probable that the microscopic magnetic trap can be created at the collider. Magnetic trap will grow capturing the normal substance. As a result, magnetic trap can destroy the Earth.
Magnetic hole is a magnetic analog of the black hole. The black hole is bounded by gravitational forces, and the magnetic hole is bounded by magnetic forces, which are many-many times stronger than gravity forces.
Magnetic hole is a magnetic dipole, in the form of a circle, where there is the critical magnetic field. The lines of magnetic induction are directed perpendicular to the plane of the circle. Nucleons are microscopic magnets, and they can be easily captured by the critical field of the hole. As a result the hole is growing.
The approximate computation shows that the minimal possible magnetic hole, which can capture a nucleon, has a mass slightly more than one thousand masses of nucleons. The Tevatron collider is now working near this region. The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) will be able to create the particles with the rest mass, which are seven times more that the minimal possible mass of magnetic hole.
According to publications, LHC will create microscopic black holes. Most theorists suggest that these black holes will disappear, because of the Hawking evaporation. However, we know that there are several theories of gravity. Some theories did not even admit the existence of black holes. In addition, there are several theories of black holes. Therefore, confidence in the classical theory of black holes and in a process of evaporation of black holes is very poor.
For several years, some scientists argue and demand to ban the construction of powerful colliders. Among the known dangerous objects that may lead to global catastrophe are the following: microscopic black holes, strangelets, magnetic monopoles, vacuum bubbles. I learned about these disputes and concerns only in early September 2008. And then I immediately noticed that the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, were almost not analyzed.
In early September, I assumed that the probability of a global catastrophe is less than 0.000001. However, after three months of analysis of the objects, bounded by magnetic forces, and after the analysis of space observations, my assessment of the global disaster has surpassed dozens of percents.
Some theorists suggest that the Higgs bosons will be registered at the LHC. Higgs boson had received a new name, "the God particle". We know that the most of particles have their corresponding antiparticles. So, if there is a particle of God, then there is a particle of Devil. Two colliding particles can give two more massive particles, - the particle and its antiparticle, for example, an electron and positron. By adding the colliding energy, we can get the God particle and its anti-particle, the magnetic trap of Devil. Particles and antiparticles have diametrically opposed properties. Indeed, the Higgs boson causes the ordinary matter to have a mass. But the magnetic hole captures the substance and transforms its rest mass-energy into another form of matter, - the magnetic field of the Devil's trap. Say me now, are we have the right to touch the particle of God?
Microscopic magnetic holes created at the collider, will move to the center of the Earth, absorbing the matter in their path. Eventually they will merge together into a single and much stronger magnetic hole. The thin shell of the Earth, together with us, will be ejected into cosmic space, but the rest of the Earth will turn into an electric current loop of several meters radius. For comparison, the radius of a black hole of the same mass is 9 millimeters. Part of Earth’s mass will be transformed into magnetic field of neutron hole, and another part will be transformed into radiation and kinetic energy of the released shell.
Magnetic hole will not decay if it was born in such cold place, as the collider, where the temperature is close to 0 K. If the magnetic hole is born in a collision of space particle with atmospheric particle, it has a speed, which is close to the speed of light. As a result, such magnetic hole will evaporate almost immediately as a result of energetic collisions with atmospheric particles. Such evaporating magnetic hole will form a cosmic-ray particle shower. Such showers are observable.
Huge magnetic holes are also observable is cosmos.
In the remnants of supernova SN 1987A we can see a system of rings, which remind us the magnetic hole. It is possible that this magnetic hole is decaying now.
It seems as if these rings embrace a hyperboloid. And now look at the electron, moving along two hyperboles in coordinates x, ict, in my electron model program. Each electron crosses the entire Universe in a period of time, which is equal to the classical period of the electron. This paradoxical conclusion is the consequence of the Special Relativity Theory. The ring structure of SN 1987A and our electron model have common visible properties. The Earth and the Sun can be turned into the same ring structure.
Magnetic collapse is much more rapid than the gravity collapse. At the process of magnetic collapse the nucleon turns such, that its magnetic dipole moment becomes parallel to the magnetic dipole moment of a trap. Gravity collapse needs displacing of a matter inside the Schwarzschild radius. The time interval of neutrino registration at neutrino observatories had proved the reality of magnetic collapse of dying stars.
Particle's collision energies and bombs:
Several eV - chemical bomb;
Several MeV - nuclear bomb;
Several TeV - hyper bomb.
Chemical bomb is accompanied by the change of chemical
structure of matter.
Nuclear bomb is accompanied by the change of nuclear structure of matter.
Hyper bomb is accompanied by the transformation of solid matter into a field.
Scientific crime.
Only crazy people can try to create the particles with the rest mass, more than 1000 nucleon masses. It is very possible that in the region from 1000 to 7000 aum, hundreds types of particles and resonances can be created. It is clear, that the most of them will decay. But some of them will grow, capturing the ordinary matter.
Academician Migdal wrote 30 years ago about pion condensation in the strong fields. As a result he had come to conclusion that neutron stars can have any masses. My approximate computation also shows that the minimal possible neutron star can have a mass, about one thousand of nucleon masses. Such embryos of neutron star can by made in collider.
Not long ago the new strange unexpected particle was discovered at the Tevatron collider. It decays at several muons, up to eight units. Somebody had already named it the Halloween particle. I named it the muon hole. What will be made the next? The magnetic trap of Devil?
Majority of contemporary physicists imagine quark-gluon plasma as a suck with peas. That is a very dangerous imagination. Particles are not points with labels, where their quantum properties were written. Particles are not the material essences, independent of space-time; they are just space-time elements, strings.
Dear reader, the situation is extremely serious. The physics now is in the deep crisis. Theorists, in order to save their religious Big Bang theory, invented “the dark energy" as a new either. They want now to test their wretched theories at the powerful Large Hadron Collider.
Those persons, with high ranks and high scientific degrees, who cry about the safety of LHC, had already made a crime now. The LHC was launched despite the fact that there were court trials. The Earth could be exploded the 21 of September 2008, but the accident, which had happened two days earlier, had saved us. Scientists-criminals continue to lie about the safety of the LHC, and are preparing the global terrorist crime now.
Dear reader! Big Bang adherents can lead the Earth to the utter destruction. Particle collisions with the energy more then 1 TeV must be prohibited by the international law. The science must be cleared from the Big Bang delusion. Big-bangers want to touch the particle of God, but thus, they lead us into the magnetic trap of Devil. People, will you silently endure the massacre?
Some documents and links.
In November 2008, I arrived to Moscow in order to file a lawsuit against the Russian Academy of Sciences and against the most active propagandists/promoters of the LHC launch. Unfortunately, for the lack of funds, I could not did it then.
In late November at the "meeting of four" there was decided to hear my report "What will LHC give us, the particle of God, or magnetic trap of Devil?" at a workshop in one of the leading institutions of Moscow. But later, I received a "retreat" from this institution.
In December, I sent the Letter to the President of Russia. In January, I received an answer in which it was stated that my letter was forwarded to the Russian Academy of Sciences.
In December, I sent the Letters to the Prosecutors Office of the Russian Federation. Soon after, I received the answer stating that my letter "was sent for review in the prescribed manner".
In the end of January I returned to Feodosia (Ukraine) and continued to inform about the risks of the global catastrophe. You can read some letters, which were send to the Google groups, - just click my Google-profile.
Reproduction of biospheres and civilizations. Who are you, dear reader: "a cell of good reason", "a curiosity cell", or "thoughtless muscular cell"?
Magnetic trap of Devil. Recent calculations show that it is not excluded that microscopic magnetic traps were already created, and they are growing now somewhere inside the Earth.
Arguments, proving that "The LHC will lead to global catastrophe"; "Magnetic holes exist"; "We will not be able to prevent the LHC launch and the following global catastrophe". Religious and mystic arguments.
Read the frequently updated page
Save Yourself - The Business Offer
for more news, links and developments of this topic.