I. Appoint Strobe Talbott, Deputy Secretary of State. Mr. Talbott was at Oxford as a
Rhodes Scholar at the same time Clinton was there dodging the draft, demonstrating against America, visiting Russia, etc.
J. Appoint William S. Daley Secretary of Commerce, Clinton's 1992 Illinois Campaign
Manager, who appears to have been involved in questionable activities in the Chicago area involving fraud, the IRS and the FBI (http://www.crl.org/daleygeo.html). The lawsuit against Daley and his firm Daley and George, which dragged on for 5 years, (1992-1997) was dropped by the 'prosecutor' exactly one month after Daley was sworn in as Secretary of Commerce on 1/31/97. Also, he may have misrepresented himself in his Senate confirmation hearings. Mr. Daley is/was a partner in the international law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt where he was "concentrating in the area of corporate and government relations matters" (paid lobbyist?). The firm has offices in Moscow and Beijing, with emphasis on Communist China. If he is still a partner, on leave of absence or not, he is benefiting from the firm's dealings with China and Russia.
K. Appoint Bill Richardson, Secretary of Energy, from New Mexico - home of the
Los Alamos Lab. Mr. Richardson stated on the Chris Mathews' program that China was not a Communist country, that China is our friend, that China could be trusted to control a port in Southern California and that China could be trusted with its presence in Panama where it could control both ends of the canal.
IV. As the key figures move into place, the President creates an illusion of being concerned with National security by issuing the following:
A. Executive Order #12946 - 1/20/95 - President's Advisory Board on Arms Proliferation
Policy. (Established a board to advise the President on implementation of U.S.  conventional arms transfer policy and other issues related to arms proliferation policy.)
B. Executive Order #12949 - 2/19/95 - Foreign Intelligence Physical Searches. (The authorization of physical searches for foreign  intelligence purposes.)
C. Executive Order #12951 - 2/24/95 - Release of Imagery Acquired by Space-Based
National Intelligence. (Declassification of imagery acquired by the three space-based national intelligence reconnaissance systems and review for future public release of intelligence imagery.)
D. Executive Order #12958 - 3/21/95 - Classified National Security Information. (Prescribes a uniform system for classifying,  safeguarding, and declassifying national security information.)
E. Executive Order #12968 - 8/2/95 - Access to Classified Information ("This order establishes a uniform Federal personnel security program for employees who will be considered for initial or continued access to classified information." "… in order to protect our citizens, our democratic institutions, and our participation with the community of nations. The unauthorized disclosure of information classified in the national interest can cause irreparable damage to the national security and loss of human life.") (Clinton, who has never been investigated for a Top Security Clearance, carefully excluded himself from this order; otherwise, under this EO, he would be denied access to classified information.)
F. Executive Order #12951 - 10/19/95 - Interagency Security Committee (Provides a permanent body to address continuing government-wide security for Federal facilities.)
G. Executive Order #13010 - 7/19/96 Critical Infrastructure Protection. (Establishes the
President's Commission on Critical Infrastructure Protection to develop and oversee a comprehensive national policy and implementation strategy for protecting critical infrastructures from physical and cyber threats.)
V. As Vernon Jordan would say - "Mission accomplished".

Is it a coincidence that the two 'appointees', who have authority over the dissemination of information to the President regarding National Security, Berger and Harrington, are both partners in the same international law firm that has dealings with China and Russia? And that these two 'appointees' are currently listed as attorneys in the Washington branch of Hogan and Hartson (website updated August 1998), where they are, as partners, directly or indirectly, receiving benefits from dealings with China and Russia. This clearly is a conflict of interest (allegiances) which, by law, should deny them a security clearance and access to classified material.
Is it a coincidence that the Inspector General of the DOJ Michael R. Bromwich and the Secretary of Commerce William S. Daley were both partners in the international law firm of Mayer, Brown & Platt, working out of the firm's Washington office? The firm has offices in Moscow and Beijing, with emphasis on China. If they are still partners in the firm, on leave of absence or not, they are benefiting, directly or indirectly, from the firm's dealings with China and Russia and hence have a conflict of interest (allegiances) which, by law, should deny them a security clearance and access to classified material.
Also, George Tenet, Director of the CIA, and Sandy Berger, National Security Advisor, both served on Clinton's national security transition team - a totally failed exercise demonstrating, at best, no knowledge or concern for National Security and the appropriate clearances. (Security irregularities during the 'transition' period are well documented. For example, WSJ 10/05/98 states "14 months into Clinton's first term, more than 100 staffers lacked security clearances".  House Report 104-862 states "In general, the FBI files issue shows a lack of respect by the Clinton administration for proper security procedures to protect both the President of the United States and the national security. This is all the more so since the White House ignored recommendations from a Democratic committee chairman of the U.S. Senate to take security precautions in response to reported security irregularities in the first years of the Clinton administration.")Intentional or not, this provides serious doubt about their ability to handle such high positions in our National Security system.
This summary of events does not begin to scratch the surface, as we do not have access to official information on all those appointees who 'resigned', 'died' or were indicted. An examination of the background and 'allegiances' of those individuals should be considerably more telling than those included here.
And then there are all the rest of Clinton's appointees who are still employed by our Government, whose 'bios' are not in the public domain - most of whom appear to be, at best, grossly incompetent and passing off on any and all of Clinton's plans, or at worst . . . . .
The information in this summary was obtained from official websites:.gov, AOL yellow pages, and webpages of the law firms mentioned herein, with limited use of the regular AOL search of highly reliable sources. While the information included herein is certainly believed to be factual, the readers are left to ponder the evidence and implications and to draw their own conclusions. While we do not state that any of the above mentioned persons are consciously involved in any illegal activity, the facts are certainly curious.
This outlined scenario is an attempt to bring to light the ease with which a corrupt President could destroy our National Security. Hopefully, Congress will exercise every option to stop the damage.
Add this information to the Cox Report, the Thompson Report, the Judicial Watch investigations, the cover-up of espionage, and other treasonous 'accomplishments' of this Administration and the question must be asked:

Is this a coincidence,  Or a carefully crafted plan to sell out America?

4/17/99, Please use this information 'at your pleasure'!