Proposal Evaluation Criteria
Projects will be evaluated on the following criteria; to avoid
guess-work, use this list to help you plan, organize, and write your proposal.
Syllabus
Schedule
Course
Information
Project
Proposal
Evaluation Criteria
Weekly
Conferences
|
|
Content - 30%
- The problem is clearly identified.
- The most important elements are addressed, given the
research problem.
- Background coverage and related issues are sufficient.
- The discussion of the research problem is focused and
relevant.
- The content is accurate.
- The terms and definitions are explained.
Development - 20%
- The student recognizes the broader field from within which
the research problem originates.
- The student demonstrates an understanding of the
importance of the research problem and related issues to Marketing.
- Transitions from one idea to next are logical as the
discussion is developed.
Strategic Elements - 30%
- The proposal addresses the strategic importance of the
research problem.
- The student identifies the reasons why the
research
problem is relevant to marketing decision making.
- The student identifies the importance of the research
problem to industry competitiveness.
Organization, Grammar, and Mechanics - 20%
- The proposal is well structured and organized, addressing
the six parts of a typical research proposal.
- Transition words are used to move between paragraphs.
- Paragraphs are coherent and sentences are varied.
- Sentence structure is correct.
- Verb use is correct.
- Pronoun use is correct.
- Modifier use is correct.
- Word use is correct.
- Spelling is correct.
- Punctuation is correct.
- Directions for the assignment are followed and completed
as required.
- The proposal is submitted on the due date.
- Background sources are cited correctly and bibliographical
format is correct.
|
|