Link to go directly to the table of links
Census data is an important part of family history research. It never seems
to give all of the information that we are looking for but it can be a major
clue to help us along. My experience with census data is primarily with the US
Federal census data on microfilm. Reading this data is somewhat of an art since
much of the data is very difficult to read, due to poor handwriting, poor photographic
quality and mediocre microfilm readers. The data contained in the links are my
interpretation of what I saw on the microfilm. Sometimes the data was easy to
determine and other times it was next to impossible to figure out what I was
reading. In the end, I have tried to give the microfilm reel numbers and the
dwelling/family numbers so that anyone can go into the microfilm and see
the data for themselves so they can decide whether what I wrote is valid or not.
This is an ongoing project. As I find different family names to be
of importance, I search for instances of that family name in the microfilm.
Most of the data that I currently have comes from the Franklin, Orleans and
Addison counties of Vermont (because that is where my family has it origins).
However, I am starting to get data from all over New England and New York
state and have added that data (as I find it) to the pages linked below.
The US census data is available up to 1930 (except for the 1890 census,
which was destroyed in a fire before it was reproduced). The 1930 microfilm
has been released recently. Some of the data has been added to the tables.
However, there are no indicies available to help search through the census
data so it will be quite a while before more data will be added here.
I am interested in getting access to Canadian census information, especially
for the counties of Quebec province that border on Vermont. Some information
is listed below. As I get access to more microfilm reels, I will add data here.
If, at any time, you, the reader, find an error in this data, I would appreciate
knowing about it so I can update my data.
One note about the data entries in the census data: you will notice that many entries
contain question marks -- usually from one to five question marks. The more question marks
that appear in the data, the less likely it is that the particular data item (usually a name)
is correct. So, a single question mark means that a letter or two may be incorrect. Five
question marks say that the whole name is probably wrong (it was my best guess based on the
hand-writing and reproductive quality that existed).
Census Links
Link to data
| Type of Census Data
| Notes
| Date last updated
| Bousquet/ | Booska 1910
| US
| Vermont data.
| May 18, 2001
| 1920
| US
| Vermont data.
| May 18, 2001
| 1930
| US
| Vermont data.
| April 19, 2002
| Cousineau/ | Cousino 1910
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 17, 2001
| 1920
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 17, 2001
| 1930
| US
| Vermont data.
| April 19, 2002
| Lague/Lahue
| 1850
| US
| Vermont and New York data.
| Apr 14, 2001
| 1860
| US
| Vermont, Massachusetts and New York data.
| Apr 22, 2001
| 1870
| US
| New England, New York and Pennsylvania data.
| Oct 21, 2001
| 1880
| US
| New England, New York and Pennsylvania data.
| Jan 12, 2003
| 1900
| US
| Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire data.
| Jul 11, 2001
| 1900
| US
| New York, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island data.
| Nov 4, 2001
| 1900
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jan 2, 2003
| 1910
| US
| Connecticut, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island and Vermont data.
| Jan 12, 2003
| 1920
| US
| New England (except Massachusetts & Vermont) and New York data.
| Jul 11, 2001
| 1920
| US
| Massachusetts data.
| Jul 2, 2001
| 1920
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jan 2, 2003
| 1930
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jan 2, 2003
| Laplant
| 1850
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| 1860
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| 1870
| US
| Vermont data.
| Aug 8, 2000
| 1900
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| 1910
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| McAllister
| 1850
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| 1860
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| 1870
| US
| Vermont data.
| Jul 5, 2000
| Provencher/ | Provoncha 1850
| US
| Massachussetts and New Hampshire data.
| May 12, 2001
| 1860
| US
| New England and New York data.
| May 12, 2001
| 1870
| US
| New York data.
| May 12, 2001
| 1910
| US
| Vermont data.
| May 18, 2001
| 1920
| US
| Vermont data.
| May 18, 2001
| 1930
| US
| Vermont data.
| April 19, 2002
| Quebec
|
1871
| Canada
| The data consists of all family
names of interest to me that exists in Canadian census reels (which, for now, is
mostly of the Brome and Sheffield districts).
| May 28, 2001
|
1881
| Canada
| Jun 3, 2001
| Richford, VT
|
1920
| US
| All the major pieces of the 1920 Richford, VT, census
data were entered into a GEDCOM file and were then converted into HTML.
| Feb 10, 2001
| |
---|
A year or more ago, I came across a web page for
Heritage Quest.
This company sells the census data both on microfilm and on CD (where each page
of the census has been digitized and the CDs contain the images equivalent to
a reel of microfilm). Although the data isn't always as clear as that found
on the microfilm, I have found that much of the data is just as easy to
understand on the
CDs as it was on the microfilm. Plus, the viewing program allows us to zoom in
on an image -- a benefit that none of the microfilm viewers that I have used
can match. In my opinion, those people who do not have ready access to the
census data on microfilm will find that the CDs are well worth purchasing.
The same is not true
for their index CDs, though. I have a number of the 1870
index CDs (for all of the New England states, New York and some of the
mid-western states) and a few of the 1910 index CDs and, given
the amount of errors that I have found when I have used them,
these CDs are not worth paying full-price for. However, they are better than nothing
and are worth picking up if you can find them on sale. The same is true for
the AIS census indices CDs from Ancestry.com. Although they claim to be the
"standard" for census indicies, the indicies are rife with errors. A real
handwriting expert is needed to create good census indicies and neither the
Heritage Quest indicies or the Ancestry.com indicies look like they used enough
experts to avoid some of the errors that exist.